1973.09.12 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

page 4 Donald Lobsinger-13327 Goodview Ave.-questioned what the term"dog kennel" meant. Charles Johnson stated a dog kennel is any place where four or more dogs over six months of age are owned, kept, bred, and or offered for sale except a veternary clinic. Mr. Lobsinger also mentioned that he had five acres and didn't like the idea of minimum one acre lots across the road from him. Said it would make the value of his land go down. It was not reasonable. Mayor Carlson questioned whether Mr. Lobginger was suggesting that his area be zoned agricultural and he said it would defi- nitely be better. Dr. Chapman-suggested continuing the public hearing to some future date with the only subject for discussion being changes that the council is considering from its present draft. Ed Harold-Upper 126th St. Oakshore Park-said there is a five acre parcel in the oakshore area designated for park use, but not public park Use as stated it should be in the ordinance. Wondered if they would have to obtain special use permits to put up ball diamonds. Attorney Johnson said they could probably apply for a variance under a hardship case. Robert McCloud-9627 122nd St.-suggested putting the propozed ordinance up before the people for a vote, rather than leaving it entirely up to the villagecouncil, some members of which he did not approve. Attorney Johnson again explained that the adoption of the plan or its rejection was up to the village council. Ken Tschida-Grace Development Co.-owns property in Sections 30 and 31 of the village, is zoned (proposed) SFE and objects strongly to this. He questioned Carl Dale whether future sewer area should be zoned this way. Mr. Tschida thought this area should be zoned single family urban. Mr. Dale stated that if the majority of the property owners want to be zoned dif- ferently, they should let this fact be known to the village council. Theodora Peltier-wanted to know from the planning commission if they had to use the sewer service area as a guide for the residential zoning. Dan Spitzer stated that they did not have to, but chose to, to provide orderly development of the village along with developing services and to avoid placing an undue hardship on those people who might be zoned for a more densely populated area where the plans .f the village for extension of sewer system is not feasible at this time. Attorney Johnson then gave a description of the Limited Business, Retail Butines3 and Consentrated Busniess Districts, with principal uses, access- ory used, and special uses.Comments were as follows: Eugene Peltier-Owner Countryside Center-read aloud a petition he had brought to the village clerk's office September 12th regarding the rezoning of approximately a five block area along and on the east side of Highway # 61 from 170th Street to 175th Street. According to the present proposed zon- ing map, this area is to be zoned agricultural, and there are commercial businesses located there at the present time.Would like this area to 4e zoned commercial, as they feel they have a right to grow, and would not be hurting anyone around them. Attorney Johnson next gave a description of the Industrial District, its permitted uses, accessory uses, and special uses.. Greg Cardinal-165th Street-wondered if the junk yards now in the village would have to go eventually, as they are not zoned industial on the map. Attorney Johnson stated that where there is an open use of land, there would be a phase out eventually, and if the operation is to continue, and meet the requirements of planning, the alternative would be to come in and ask for a rezoning.