My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1972.01.17 PC Minutes
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1972 PC Minutes
>
1972.01.17 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2015 11:29:34 AM
Creation date
3/4/2015 11:29:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
1/17/1972
Document Type
Minutes
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A <br /> Orric6:845-0393 <br /> RES.489.1528 <br /> HOWARD A. KUUSISTO <br /> CONSULTING ENGINEERS <br /> 1937 UNIVERSITY AVE. ST.PAUL.MINN.55104 <br /> January 17, 1972 <br /> Planning Commis s ion <br /> Hugo, <br /> Minnesota 55033 <br /> Re: Hugo, Minnesota <br /> Husink's Two Inches <br /> Dear Commission Membe L s: <br /> lie have completed our review of the preliminary plat dated December 1971, <br /> for Husink's "Two Inches Sub-Division," within the Village of Hugo. The <br /> plat is located north of 147th Street abutting onto Foxhill Avenue to <br /> 140th Street and on the west side of Foxhill Avenue north of 148th St., <br /> a distance of 381.9 feet. To develop the area east of Foxhill Avenue <br /> north from 147th Street northerly to 140th Street, a variance for lot <br /> dimension is required. The lots in this area have sufficient area, but <br /> do not comply with all parts of the code. <br /> Foxhill Avenue and 140th Street east of Foxhill Avenue are travelled <br /> streets. Total improvement to the streets have not been completed. <br /> According to the preliminary plat that was reviewed, the following items <br /> where not included and therefore, no comment can be made, except to note <br /> the deficiences. <br /> 1. Angles were omitted from the survey. <br /> 2. The acreage of the development has not been shown. <br /> 3. The existing utilities have not been included. <br /> 4. Topographic data has been omitted. <br /> -1- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.