1991.01.22 CC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City Council meeting of January 22, 1991 Page ._ The required permits have been secured from the Rice Creek Watershed District. 8. Required approvals must be secured from the Environmental Quality Board. 9. Method of installing this 16" gas main under municipal streets must be approved by the city engineer. 10. The 16" gas main must be installed in a manner as recommended by the city engineer and agreed to by the City and NSF'. 11. Copies of all road crossing permits from Washington County and the State of Minnesota must be filed with the City by NSF'. 12. Northern States Power shall keep the City of Hugo informed as to the progress of this project and must make every reasonable effort to implement restoration of the site to the satisfaction of the City. 13. NSF shall provide written guarantees assuring compliance with this permit, and reimbursement of reasonable inspection fees incurred by the City. 14. The 16" gas main shall be installed in a location as recommended by the city engineer and city staff, and agreed to by the City of Hugo and NSP. 15. All gas main crossings of City streets shall be approved by the City engineer. All aye. Motion Carried. 8.2 CITY PRIORTIES (UPDATE) Earlier this month, each member of the City Council was sent a list of possible City priorities for the upcoming year. Notice of the City Council establishing priorities was sent to the community in our last newsletter. The City staff would like to update the priority list by adding various Council priorites for consideration. It is nice to have a draft -list to word' from when you begin the priority-ranE::ing process. It would be extremely helpful to the staff to Einow if the Council would liE::e to proce'-d with a priority -setting exercise, and set a timetable to accomplish this. The proposed priority list will be discussed at a later date. RESOLUTION FROM AD HOC LITIGATION COMMITTEE Councilman Fran Miron proposed a resolution to attempt to negotiate a settlement between the City of Hugo and Mr. and Mrs. David Schuman for City Council consideration. In light of the potential litigation regarding the David Schumann .prosecution, and previous direction of the City Council, the City staff suggested that the City Council discuss the following with legal counsel before maE::ing a decision on this matter: 1. Could the City's civil case against David Schumann be seriously jeopardized by discussions with an ad hoc committee if the results of the committee's efforts are futile, and a mutually acceptable agreement is not reached? In light of the Notice of Claim filed by Mr. Schumann against the City corporate and its officials, could the City's defense of a future claim be jeopardized by the discussion with Mr. Schumann--." The Council