1990.02.20 CC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

JUGO._�IITY 790 The meeting was called to order by Mayor George Atkinson at 7:00 PM. PRESENT: McAllister, Jesinski, Olson, Vail, Atkinson City Administrator, Ken Huber City Clerk, Mary Ann Creager Vail made motion, Olson seconded, to approve the minutes for the regular City Council meeting of February 5, 1990 as amended. All aye. Motion Carried. Jesinski made motion, Olson seconded, to approve the claims for February 20, 1990 in the amount of $100,865.01' All aye. Motion Carried' CHARITABLE GAMBLING Atkinson made motion, Vail seconded, that the City of Hugo has no objection to the issuance of a gambling license to the Minnesota Waterfowl Association to hold a raffle on April 7, 1990 at Willie's 61 Club, 17285 Forest Blvd, Hugo, MN., and waives the 60 day waiting period. VOTING AYE: Jesinski, Olson, Vail, Atkinson ABSTAINED: McAllister Motion Carried. MINOR SUBDIVISION,(ZALUC-KYJ/SCHTOWCHAN) Mr- Alex ZaIuckyj and Mr. George Schtowchan have made application to the City of Hugo for approval of a minor subdivision which consolidates three existing parcels into two lots by certificate of survey' The property contains approximately 74 acres and is zoned conservancy. Part of the property in question abuts on Oneka Lake with Oneka Lake Boulevard physically dividing the site in question. Copies of this request were submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the DNR, and the RCWD. Despite the fact that there have been flooding problems along Oneka Lake, there is a judicial ditch on site as well as a connection between two major flood zones (A) on this site, the three previously mentioned governmental agencies have indicated they have no concern with regard to the subdivision at this time. The City staff was surprised by the lack of interest on the part of these agencies in light of the very strict requirements they have placed on other individuals dividing property in the City of Hugo. On April 6, 1989, the Hugo Planning Commission held a public hearing on this request, and acted to approve said subdivision subject to the special conditions reflected in the PC minutes. At the time of the hearing before the Planning Commission, the City staff noted several major areas of concern that still have not been addressed by the applicants: 1. The format of the survey is not as requested for signing and filing. 2. The key regarding property iron locations on the survey is incorrect. 3. It is difficult to tell where the exi*sting property lines are, and where the proposed property lines are to be. 4. It appears that the south property line of proposed Tract A goes right through a house located on site.