1989.01.17 CC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City Council meeting of January 17, 1989 Page Vail made motion, McAllister seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION 89-2, RESOLUTION ADOPTING A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR A CABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM FOR THE CITY OF HUGO. VOTING AYE: McAllister, Jesinsk:i, Olson, Vail, Atkinson VOTING NAY: NONE Motion Carried. McAllister made motion, Jesinsk:i seconded, to schedule a special meeting of the Hugo City Council for Thursday, February 23, 1989, at 7:00 PM, for the purpose of holding a public hearing for consideration of proposals submitted for a cable communications system in the City of Hugo. All aye. Motion Carried. MINOR SUND (R. POTTSMITH) Richard and Harriet Pottsmith have made application to the City of Hugo for the subdivision of a 40 acre tract of land into two 20 acre parcels in a Conservancy district. Currently there is a home located on Parcel A of the survey. The applicants have requested waiver of the formal platting requirements for survey approval. Parcel B of the proposed survey is located in Floodplain Zone A (100 year flood) as per the city's Flood Insurance Map. Hardwood Creek: runs in a north/south direction through all of Parcel B in this proposed subdivision. Throughout the review process, city staff has been concerned with regard to an acceptable building location on site as well as the ability to provide an on --site =ewer system in this area. The DNR has indicated that they have no problem with this proposal, and RCWD has issued a permit and established minimum floor elevation for buildings at 914 feet. In reviewing the site percolation test, and the preliminary survey provided, it would appear that the location for the proposed on-site sewer system is not within the buildable area of the site. Mr. Pottsmith has informed the city that the map accompanying the percolation report is incorrect, and that the pert holes are actually within the buildable area as shown on the survey. The: Planning Commisson reviewed this request at their November 22, 1988 meeting, and recommended approval of the survey, and waiver of the formal platting requirements, subject to special. conditions. McAllister made motion, Vail seconded, to approve the final certificate of survey #1-17-89(A) for Richard and Harriet Pottsmith, waiver of the formal. platting procedure, for the following described property: The !•a1= 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 7, T31N, R21.W, Washington County, Minnesota. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All fees relating to the subdivision shall be pairs by the applicant including the cost of recording documents with Washington County. 2. Developer pity fee in lieu of parkland dedication at the time of final survey approval in the amount of `l;550.00. 2. A drainage plan including holding ponds and ditches- must be approved by the watershed district and maintained by the property owner with the method of maintenance:; to be reviewed by the city engineer.