My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1989.09.05 CC Minutes
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1989 CC Minutes
>
1989.09.05 CC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2017 1:45:21 PM
Creation date
9/23/2015 9:09:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
9/5/1989
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M 1 NUTES _FOR_ l; HE RiF..C;UL_AR C I l_ C]t_11�I1 T L.. _ M EI�I NG LIFE ;F l�E+MIFF F; 19 t' <br />The meeting was called to order by Mayor Atkinson at 6:00 PM. <br />PRESENT: McAllister, Jesinsk:i, Olson, Vail, Atkinson <br />City Administrator, Ken Huber <br />Finance Director, Ron Otk:in <br />City Clerk, Mary Ann Creager <br />Olson made motion, Vail seconded, to approve the minutes for the regular <br />City Council meeting of August 21, 1989 as submitted. <br />All ave. Motion Carried. <br />McAllister made motion, Vail seconded, to approve the General Claims for <br />September 5, 1969 in the amount of $29,766.92. <br />All aye. Motion Carried. <br />Vail made motion, Jesinsk:i seconded, to approve the Utility Claims for <br />September 5, 1989 in the amount of $0,883.73. <br />All ave. Motion Carried. <br />1990 BUDGET PROPOSAL. <br />The City Council scheduled tonight's meeting for 6:00 PM, as the first of <br />three open hearings on the review of the City's proposed 1990 general fund <br />and utilities budget. The budget prepared by the City staff reflects a 7; <br />increase in spending from the City's 1989 budget of $870,966. The staff <br />is projecting revenues of $919,667 in 1990, which is up approximately 5.6% <br />from the current year'=_. projection. The proposed budget is not balanced, <br />as submitted to the Council, and will either have to be cut. approximately <br />$13,000 in expenditures or increased by the same amount in revenues. The <br />overall. tax Levy increase of 9 1/2%, as proposed, is somewhat misleading <br />in that this increase includes homestead credit paid by the State of <br />Minnesota. The ad valorem tax levy, as reflected in the revenue budget, <br />is as follows: <br />1.. $374,4e5 tax Levy for the general fund. <br />2. $137,782.25 c <br />..7 , 7 8.�.2_� for long-term debt. <br />3. $1647041. Homestead credit not paid in property taxes. <br />Budget highlights include a sealcoat.ing program for downtown streets., a <br />doubling of the City's gravel budget, funding for recodi.fication of the <br />City's codes, computer software, supplies for a central filing system, and <br />acquisition of a new water --well site. In rebudgeted funds for special <br />projects, City staff included $1.90,000 for new road construction and <br />approximately $70,000 for a water management study, both of which were <br />funded in previous ye=ars.. <br />After review of the budget by the Cite: Council, the following items were <br />to be considered for further discussion. - <br />1. Consider exchanging some of the '15,000 budgeted for rec_odif cat.:i_en of <br />the City codt_bo:_ k for repair- of the City's tennis courts. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.