1989.10.16 CC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

/3/ MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 16, 1989 The meeting was called to order by Mayor Atkinson at 7:00 PM. PRESENT: McAllister, Jesinski, Olson, Vail, Att%inson City Administrator, Ken Huber City Clerk:, Mary Ann Creager Jesk:inski made motion, Vail seconded, to approve the minutes for the regular City Council meeting of October 2, 1989 as submitted. All aye. Motion Carried. Vail made motion, Olson seconded, to approve the claims for October 16, 1989 in the amount of $198,841.90. All aye. Motion Carried. SET BUDGET HEARING DATES The City Finance Director, Ran Otk:in, has reviewed the new requirements of the Commissioner of Revenue regarding compliance with Truth in Taxation, and is recommending the following dates for Council action: 1. The preliminary tax levy be acted on by the City Council at their November b, 1989 regular meeting. 2. The formal budget hearing for review and adoption of the City's general fund budget be set for December 4, 1989 along with approval of the final tax levy. AtE::inson made motion, Olson seconded, that the City Council set December 4, 1989 as the public hearing to adopt the City's general fund budget and approve the final tax levy. All aye. Motion Carried. SPECIAL USE PERMIT - ACCESSORY BLDG (D. SANTANNI) Mr. Dan Santanni of 1019 W. Sherren Street, Roseville, MN., has made application to the City of Hugo for the construction of a 40' x 54' pole barn in an agricultural zone prior to construction of a principal residence. This matter was reviewed by the Hugo City Council at their October 2, 1989 regular meeting. Action on this request was tabled by the City Council pending submittal of the required documents as required by the Hugo Planning Commission or consolidation of the property in question into one 80 acre tract. Information provided by the county auditor's office indicates that Mr. Santanni is now fee owner of the 8i_) acre tract in question, and has made application requesting the combining of property into a single tax parcel. Mr. Santanni submitted a petition signed by residents adjacent to his property indicating that they had no objection to the construction of the pole barn in question. The City staff indicated some concern regarding the use of the building for other than agricultural purposes. Because there was previously a principal residence on the property, and there are existing accessory buildings on the property already, Olson