1988.10.17 CC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

131 City Council meeting of October 17, 1988 Rape _ request. if actual costs exceed this sum, the developer shall make such additional deposit upon request as the city may require. The developer shall pay all costs incurred hereunder by the city. The city shall refund the developer any remaining funds. 7. Any driveway permits requiring access to highways or county roads may not be issued until permits are secured from Washington County or MNDOT. B. On-site activities permitted as a result of this subdivision shall not cause the altering of any watercourse, ditch, or drainage system in this area. 9. Percolation tests are to be submitted to the city prior to final plat approval. 10. All parkland dedication fees ($875.00) are to be paid by the applicant prior to recording of this plat. 11. Issuance of deed approvals or building permits shall be subject to compliance with the above listed conditions. 12. Any improvements to the roadway serving this property shall be made at the property owner's expense. 13. All easements identified on the site shall be accessible to the appropriate governmental agencies by public roadway. 14. Building setbacks for Lots 4 and 5 shall, in addition to meeting city ordinance setback-. requirements, comply with Minnesota Statutes as they relate to the shooting preserve across the street. 15. The high water level of this development shall be 969 feet above sea level. 16. The lowest permitted basement or floor level within this development shall be 973 feet with a 4 foot separation recommended due to level of uncertainty of existing and future conditions. All aye. Motion Carried. ZONING ORDINANCE REVISIONS At the October ?, 1988 regular meeting of the Hugo City -Council, a proposed zoning ordinance format was tentatively approved by the City Council in its effort to modify and update our existing ordinance. A questionnaire was sent out to all members of the City Council last spring for the purpose of obtaining input from the Council regarding needed changes in the ordinance. City staff submitted a proposed resolution outlining possible ordinance modifications for consideration by the City Council for discussion at the Council meeting Monday evening. After a review of the zoning and a lengthy discussion, the followinq motion was introduced: Peltier made motion, Vail seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION 88-49, RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE REVIEW AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE ZONING REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF HUGO CHAPTER 32-c_ OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE. VOTING AYE: Olson, Peltier, Potts, Vail, Atkinson VOTING NAY: NONE Motion Carried. Potts made motion, Olson seconded, to adjourn at 9:45 PM. A-�? aye, �M.Ption erried. Mary Ara Creager, City .leri::