Laserfiche WebLink
103 <br />MINUTES OF' THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE HUGO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE REGULAR CITY <br />COUNCIi... MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 1.987 <br />PRESENT: Peltier, Potts, Olson, Vail, Atkinson <br />City Administrator, k::en Huber <br />City Engineer, Howard f'LAUSi.Sto <br />City Clerk, Mary Ann Creager <br />Peltier made motion, Potts seconded, to approve the minutes of August 17, <br />1987 as presented. <br />All aye. Motion Carried. <br />Potts made motion, Peltier seconded, to approve the General Claims for <br />September 8, 1987, in the amount of $8,803.09. <br />All aye. Motion Carried. <br />Peltier made motion, Vail seconded, to approve the Utility Claims for <br />September 8, 1987, in the amount of $5,623.88. <br />All aye. Motion Carried. <br />6.A Homestead Drive/1.25th Street/130th Street Public Improvement Proiect <br />On behalf of Sunset Lak.-e residents, Mr. Robert Anderson and other <br />petitioners have made application to the City of Hugo to improve 125th <br />Street, Homestead Drive, and 130th Street by the installation of <br />bituminous surfacing pursuant to Chapter 429 of the Public Improvement <br />Code. Previous action by the City Council found the petition to be <br />complete, and acceptance of the feasibility reports by city engineer, <br />Howard f::.UUSiSto. The petitioners have requested that the City Council <br />assess this project on a per lot basis as opposed to a front footage <br />basis. Notice of the September 8th public hearing was published in the <br />legal newspaper and copies sent to affected property owners of record. <br />The feasibility report called for a surfaced roadway 20 fit to 28 ft in <br />width with approximately 4" of gravel base and a ?" bituminous surface. <br />Total estimated cost of this project is $95,0k'-->O.(>C>. <br />Mayor Atkinson called the public improvement hearing to order at 7:05 PM, <br />and asked that the city engineer, Howard f--::uusisto, review the proposed <br />project. The project cost has been estimated atthe project <br />consistinq of lots, at a lot assessment of appro-imately $? 900 00 <br />City Administrator, Ken Huber, explained the public improvement process to the audience. <br />The hearing was then opened to the public for their input. The majority <br />of property owners present were in favor of the project citing the <br />increased value of their property, elimination of the dust problem, and <br />reduced maintenance for their vehicles. The property owners opposed to <br />the project cited the increased speed of vehicles resulting in a possible <br />danger to children. Sean Hallet inquired if the property owners would be <br />liable for the entire cost of the project, and whether a traffic count had <br />been done to determine the number of cars using the city park at the end <br />