Laserfiche WebLink
AUGU, "T 51 41'---'74 <br /> h.., <br /> g� <br /> Vern _Pelor,ui_i appea red next reg..rding approval of a iinor Subdivision <br /> for his industrial park. 11e submitted a plan, which ,was required by <br /> the planning commission T"r. Peloquin stated he would 1 it:e part of the <br /> -road accepted by the City, and he had brought ,with him the deeds. <br /> :'otion made by Lease and seconded to accept the fill of the Vern <br /> Peloquin Industrial Par}, I'la.n. I"otion carried. <br /> Potion made by Leroux, seconded by 1-artin to grant a I`Tinor Subdivision <br /> to Vern Peloquin. Motion carried. <br /> Kotion made by LaValle, seconded by ;Iartin to delay the final acceptance <br /> of road until approval from the Engineer and Attorney on the descrip— <br /> tion of proper street is -received. Iiotion carried. <br /> Don Tauer appeared ,A th his attorney, Kenneth Rohleder, regarding his <br /> obtainings a Special Use Permit for multiple residence. This request <br /> had been denied by the planning commission because it does not -co'. <br /> with the Conp-rehensive Plan. County Planner Bill Schwab :iientioned in a <br /> letter to the planning comsnisssion that the request doesn't comply with <br /> existing land use. IIr. Rohleder stated Fr. Tauer had complied ti••;ith all <br /> requests, and submitted all data -required. He said the planning comiilis— <br /> sion based their denial on what- is not the lags. IIe believes the commis— <br /> sion acted sone,�hat arbitrarily. <br /> Mayor Lease brought out the fact that he had obtained fror.:: the County, <br /> p apers conta.inir_g private covenants on the property, one of which being <br /> that -the property shall be used for single family residence only. <br /> Potion -made by Lero=, seconded by Smith to deny the Special Use '_'-Permit <br /> for Don Tauer for I7ultiple D.wclling for the following reasons: <br /> 1 . ThP. request does not conply with -the Comprehensive Plan <br /> 2. There are private covenants on t1FLc property. <br /> T"ore discussion was held, and I"r. Rohleder :Celt the covenants might not <br /> be in effect now. Fe also said the Comprehensive .-Man is not law and is <br /> not applicable. They felt the request mould be granted, based upon the <br /> council discussion the first tir<ie they appeared. <br /> The council then voted on the i::otion. Leroux, Partin, Smith for, Lease <br /> and La-Talle opposed. Potion carried. <br /> Ed :;attgh appeared next -regarding approval of a Subdivision for property <br /> located at 140th Street I•;o. and Flay Avenue No. The planning copullission <br /> recommended approval subject to certain conditions. The p1r.;. contains <br /> eight building sites and one outlot. LaValle felt a �.Ta-riance should have <br /> been filed at the time of filing the Subdivision application, as the <br /> corner lots arc less than required size. T'r. Johnson stated the Ordinance <br /> requires that the building site be one foot above street grade. TIe also <br /> said tl�e council could treat corner lots as varainces in the acceptance <br /> of -the plat. r."ore discussion was 1:c16. on the fact that private covenants <br /> oiere to be made, with the new owners having to fill the buildi.ig sites <br /> to conply with the ordinance. The building inspector felt the ordinance <br /> should be enforced regarding the grade of -the building site before it <br /> is sold. <br />