|
2 4PRIL 4, 1977 MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS-OF THE HUGO CITY COUNCIL
<br /> The meeting was called to order by Mayor LaValle at 7:10 P.M.
<br /> PRESENT: LaValle, Spitzer, Schletty, Irsfeld, and Vail.
<br /> 3.0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
<br /> MOTION: Irsfeld made motion, seconded by Schletty, to approve the minutes of
<br /> March 21, 1977, as presented.
<br /> VOTING FOR: LaValle, Spitzer, Schletty, Irsfel&, and Vail. MOTION CARRIED
<br /> MOTION: Spitzer made motion, seconded by Irsfeld, to approve the minutes of
<br /> March 30, 1977 as presented.
<br /> VOTING FOR: LaValle, Spitzer, Schletty, Irsfeld, and Vail. MOTION CARRIED
<br /> 4.0 APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
<br /> MOTION: Vail made motion, seconded by Spitzer, to approve the general claims
<br /> of April 4, 1977, as presented.
<br /> VOTING FOR: LaValle, Spitzer, Schletty, Irsfeld, and Vail. MOTION CARRIED
<br /> MOTION: Spitzer made motion, seconded by Irsfeld, to approve the utility
<br /> claims or April 4, 1977, as presented.
<br /> VOTING FOR: LaValle, Spitzer, Schletty, Irsfeld, and Vail. MOTION CARRIED
<br /> 5.0 PETITIONS. REQUESTS. COMMUNICATIONS & LICENSES
<br /> 5.1 Delmer Strandberg — Rezoning
<br /> The Planning Commission recommended that the request be denied.
<br /> MOTION: Spitzer made motion, seconded by Vail, that the application of Delmer
<br /> Strandberg be returned to the Planning Commission, and that the Plann—
<br /> ing Commission held the necessary public hearing for rezoning.
<br /> VOTING FOR: LaValle, Spitzer, Schletty, Irsfeld., and VrO L. MOTION CARRIED
<br /> 5.2 Earl Forsblad — Liauor License
<br /> Clerk stated that Er. Forsblad is the present owner of Nashville North, and
<br /> would like the liquor license in his name. The taxes are in arrears for this
<br /> establishment.
<br /> MOTION: LaValle made motion, seconded by Schletty, that the City Clerk write
<br /> a letter to Earl Forsblad, asking him to be present at the next City
<br /> Council meeting, in regard to his liquor license application.
<br /> Spitzer said he would vote no because license was improperly submitted. Mayor
<br /> LaValle withdrew his motion.
<br /> MOTION: Spitzer made motion, seconded by Schletty, that the liquor license
<br /> application submitted by Earl Forsblad be denied because it was impro—
<br /> perly submitted (taxes in arrears) and that if Mr. Forsblad wishes to
<br /> discuss the matter further, he should appear before the City Council.
<br /> VOTING FOR: LaValle, Spitzer, Schletty, Irsfeld, and Vail. MOTION CARRIED
<br /> Mr. Spitzer read the proposed Resolution 1977-3, in regard to the proposed
<br /> sanitary landfill in Hugo.
<br /> MOTION: Spitzer made motion, seconded by LaValle, that the City Council adopt
<br /> Resolution 1977-3 (proposed Washington County landfill in Hugo).
<br /> Mr. Spitzer drew up the resolution, and asked for further comments, suggestions,
<br /> or additions to the preliminary draft. Schletty felt the final t'tragraph was
<br /> not strong enough. Irsfeld felt the city should name specifically the Hardwood
<br /> Creek area. Mr. Johnson suggested that the city identify specifically the section
<br /> being requested for the landfill, and that the city will cooperate with the
<br /> county and Metro Council in gathering information.
<br /> MOTION: Spitzer made motion, seconded by LaValle, that the followi_r•; changes
<br /> be added to Resolution 1977-3: First paragrph — Insert Sections 2
<br /> and 10 and 11 within the city,
<br /> Page 2, paragraph 3 - should read that the City d Hugo is opposed to
<br /> the establishment of the sanitary landfill in the location proposed;
<br /> be it further resolved that Washington County, etc.
<br /> Page 2, last paragraph — enhanced; be it further resolved that the
<br />
|