|
4[ QSTNE 6, 1977 MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE HUGO CITY COUNCIL
<br /> The meeting was called to order by Mayor LaValle at 7:03 P.M.
<br /> PRESENT: LaValle, Spitzer, Schletty, Irsfeld, and Vail.
<br /> MOTION: Spitzer made motion, seconded by Irsfeld; to approve the minutes of
<br /> May 16, 1977, after the following change is made: Section 8.1 —
<br /> should read 100 amp service.
<br /> VOTING FOR: LaVa11e, Spitzer, Schletty, Irsfeld, and Vail.
<br /> MOTION CARRIED
<br /> MOTION: Vail made motion, seconded by Spitzer, to approve the general claims
<br /> of June 6, 1977 as presented.
<br /> VOTING FOR: LaValle, Spitzer, Schletty, Irsfeld and Vail.
<br /> MOTION CARRIED
<br /> MOTION: Spitzer made motion, seconded by Irsfeld, to approve the utility claims
<br /> of June 6, 1977 as presented.
<br /> VOTING FOR: LaValle, Spitzer, Schletty, Irsfeld, and Vail.
<br /> MOTION CARRIED
<br /> 5.0 PETITIONS. REQUESTS. COMMUNICATIONS & LICENSES
<br /> 5.1 Neil Buschmann Complaint
<br /> Howard Schletty checked on the complaint and found two unlicensed vehicles on the
<br /> premised, which is allowable. Buschmann also has two vehicles that are close to
<br /> having the licenses expire. Mr. Schletty will check again in a month.
<br /> 5.2 Fence Complaint
<br /> Mayor LaValle has not checked on as yet, but hopes to have ready for next Council
<br /> meeting.
<br /> Public Hearing — Water Extension (County Road 8A)
<br /> The public hearing was called to order at 7:10. Clerk read notice of hearing publica—
<br /> tion. Kuusisto stated that the watermain is on the north side of 8A about 300' east
<br /> of Fondant. The estimated cost of construction would be $16,000 — $18,000, or from
<br /> $11.00 — $15.00 per front footage. Neighboring residents present were Mr. & Mrs.
<br /> Joseph Mono, 5773 Egg Lake Road, Mr. John Olinger, 5762 Egg Lake Road, and Mr.
<br /> Richard Koecher, 5818 Egg Lake Road. All the people here listed were in opposition
<br /> to the watermain extension because of the high cost. There was a written note sub—
<br /> mitted by Marlowe Lindau stating that he also was opposed to the extension. Kuusisto
<br /> stated that the cost was exorbitant because it was a small project. There is the possibility
<br /> of the developer subsidizing the major part of the expense, but that would have to be hand—
<br /> led by the developer and land owners. The public hearing was closed at 7:45 P.M.
<br /> 5.3 Delmer Strandberg — RezoninK
<br /> The Planning Commission recommended that the request be denied for the following
<br /> reasons:
<br /> 1. Rezoning down two levels — Conservancy to RRII
<br /> 2. Land is in the Flood Plain area, and
<br /> 3. Spit rezoning.
<br /> MOTION: Spitzer made motion, seconded by Irsfeld, that the Delmer Strandberg
<br /> rezoning request be denied in accordance with recommendation of the
<br /> Planning Commission. Zoning request in contradiction to comprehensive
<br /> plan.
<br /> VOTING FOR: LaValle, Spitzer, Schletty, Irsfeld, and Vail.
<br /> MOTION CARRIED
<br /> 5.4 BurLar Mining' Permit
<br /> MOTION: Schletty made motion, seconded by Spitzer, to approve the Mining Permit
<br /> for BurLar from June 30, 1977 through June 30, 1978.
<br /> VOTING FOR: LaValle, Spitzer, Schletty, Irsfeld, and Vail.
<br /> MOTION CARRIED
<br />
|