1978.01.16 CC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

JANUARY 16, 1978 MOTION: Spitzer made motion, seconded by Irsfeld, to amend the motion to move for a period of 30 days. Permit not to be further renewed unless a Building Permit is granted. VOTING FOR: LaValle, Spitzer, Irsfead, and Vail. MOTION CARRIED 5.2 Joe Zasoel - Mobile Home Renewal MOTION: Spitzer made motion, seconded by LaValle, to renew the Mobile Home Permit for Joe Zaspel, 17205 Forest Blvd., under Chapter 40, Article III, Subdivision D, for a period of 90 days. VOTING FOR: LaValle, Spitzer, Irsfeld, and Vail. MOTION CARRIED 5...3 James Johnson - Mobile Home Renewal Mrs. Johnson presented the Council with a letter from Dr. Sommerdorf stating Mr. Johnson's inability to do any heavy work or to drive a heavy truck. LaValle questioned the fact as to whether the existing use of the land actually is being used as a farming operation. Mrs; Johnson stated that they are having trouble dealing with the land owner in obtaining legal title to their acreage. The matter is now in the hands of their attorney to try and resolve the problem. Mayor LaValle stated that his problem is with the Mobile Home Permit. He feels that the permit has stretched the rules and regulations beyond what it was intended for. LaValle stated that he will investigate the matter prior to the next renewal. MOTION: Spitzer made motion, seconded by LaValle, to renew the Mobile Home Permit for James Johnson, 7194 132nd Street North, under Chapter 40, Article III, Sub- division D, for a period of 90 days, but terminal renewal under outstanding permit. VOTING FOR: LaValle, Spitzer, and Vail VOTING AGAINST: Irsfeld MOTION CARRIED 1,4 Robert McCullough - Rezoning The City Clerk checked with Dan Koehler in regard to proof of ownership regarding this rezoning. Mr. Koehler checked with the County Recorder, and they stated that there has been no change in title since 1975. A letter stating this will follow. The clerk also stated that one parcel of land had already been registered at the county. Mr. Johnson, City Attorney, suggested that the city should get some sort of more complete proof of ownership other then checking with county records. He would not recommend going ahead with the rezoning at this time. MOTION: Spitzer made motion, seconded by Irsfeld, that the McCullough rezoning request be tabled, and that the applicant be notified that no further action will be taken on the matter until adequate proof of ownership can be provided to the city's engineer and attorney.