Laserfiche WebLink
FEBRUARY 5, 1979 19 <br /> Mardon Homes - cont. <br /> VOTING FOR: LaValle, Spitzer, Schletty, Irsfeld and Vail <br /> MOTION CARRIED <br /> 5.6 Howard Moe - Minor or Major Subdivision <br /> Mr. Moe had previously attended a Planning Commission meeting request- <br /> ing a devision of his land into 5 parcels resulting in a Major Sub- <br /> division. At the Council meeting, Mr. Moe presented an alternate plan <br /> dividing the land into 4 parcels, which would still require a Major <br /> Subdivision. Mr. Moe wanted to obtain a Minor Subdivision. LaValle <br /> felt that a Major Subdivision would be appropriate, because improve- <br /> ments are available to the land, a condition would be required to <br /> obtain a drainage easement, and because other property involved, would <br /> be looking at a total picture. LaValle also stated that because there <br /> are existing streets on both sides of the property, the land would have <br /> to be surveyed at not much more expense, and would eliminate a lot of <br /> problems in the future. <br /> MOTION: Spitzer made motion, seconded by Irsfeld, that the <br /> Planning Commission be advised that the City Council <br /> recommends that the Howard Moe property is subject to <br /> regular subdivision procedures. <br /> VOTING FOR: LaValle, Spitzer, Schletty, Irsfeld and Vail <br /> MOTION CARRIED <br /> 5.7 Dan Spitzer - Personnel Policy <br /> Will be discussed later in the meeting. <br /> 6.0 REPORTS OF OFFICERS & COMMITTEES <br /> 6.1 Ordinance Committee <br /> Members of the Ordinance Committee were present, requesting clarifi- <br /> cation on the Council's request for review of the Sign Ordinance. <br /> They questioned whether a larger sign could be erected in the larger <br /> zoning districts (32 sq ft as opposed to 12 sq ft as now required) . <br /> LaValle felt it would be less complicated to keep the zoning require- <br /> ments unison. Spitzer stated that the Council is only concerned with <br /> temporary signs, and at this time, there is no provision to allow <br /> a larger sign where proper safety can be maintained. He suggested <br /> they look at 1 ) setback requirements, 2) inability to authorize a <br /> temporary sign more than 12 sq ft, and 3) maximum temporary signs <br /> on any parcel. <br /> 6.3 Water Superintendent <br /> Mr. Burkard was present and stated that McCarthy Well had inspected <br /> the city' s well and everything was in good condition. He stated <br /> that the city clears $178.00 per month for water bills. LaValle <br /> stated that there is a need for an adjustment on the water rates, <br /> and will work with Mr. Burkard and Howard Kuusisto on some type of <br /> proposal for the City Council's meeting of April 2, 1979. <br />