1980.08.04 CC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Page 84 August 4, 1980 Some seeding has already taken place, but more root growth will be required. An additional culvert will be required on the south side of Clark's driveway. Council- man Schletty was directed to contact Washington County to obtain a timetable for completion of the required work and a cost estimate. 5.8 Tom Oswald - Forest Lake Youth Service Bureau Mr. Oswald was present and stated that he was looking for commitment from Hugo for financial aid in 1981 . If granted, he would receive matching funds from the state. Mr. Oswald submitted a summary of costs anticipated for the city ($8,000) . MOTION: LaValle made motion, seconded by Spitzer, that the City of Hugo enter into the budget process $2,250.00 for the Forest Lake Youth Service Bureau. The City Clerk is to forward a letter to Mr. Oswald stating the city's intended commitment. VOTING FOR: LaValle, Spitzer, Schletty, Irsfeld MOTION CARRIED 5.4 LaMett'i & Sons - Site Plan Approval LaMetti started construction of a 40 x 300 open shed type building prior to the issuance of any Building Permit. The structure was constructed 13' from the rear property line in violation of the City Code. There is a setback requirement of 30' . Fred Nimmes, secretary of the corporation, was present and stated that he had ob- tained written approval from the affected property owner but failed to bring with him to the meeting. There was discussion as to whether the building was located adjacent the rear or side property line. The ordinance clearly states that the west property line should be considered rear yard. Mr. Nimmes was instructed to provide the letter from the adjoining property owner, fill out an application for variance, and some justification why the building should be located where proposed. MOTION: Irsfeld made motion, seconded by LaValle, to table this matter until the meeting of August 18, 1980. VOTING FOR: LaValle., Spitzer, Schletty, Irsfeld MOTION CARRIED 6.0 REPORTS OF OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES 6. 1 Ordinance Committee Attorney Johnson was instructed to provide the Ordinance Committee with the new State Statute regarding subdivision. The Ordinance Committee will again review the Subdivision Ordinance after receipt of the new information, is also directed to review the rural and urban taxing districts. 6.2 Planning Commission Attorney Johnson was instructed to draft a letter to Metro Council with Hugo's comments regarding the Amendment Procedure for the Comprehensive Plan.