1976.11.10 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE HUGO PLANNING COMMISSIO14 NOVE14BER 109 1976 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Spitzer at 8:04 P.M. Attending were Spitzer, Peloquin, Peltier, Rosenquist, Greger, Ehret, Gillen, and Bill Schwab, Washington County Planning Commissioner. Motion made by Ehret, seconded by Greger, to approve the minutes of the October 27 , 1976 meeting after the following change was made: Page 2 — Applicant for Special Use Permit for Little Lamb's Preschool is actually Shepherd of the Fields Church, not June Smith. Bald eagle Sportsman Club Attorney Peters called and stated that material was not ready for the meeting. Would tentatively like matter delayed until December 8th meeting. Chairman Spitzer suggested that they defer any action until after the first of the year. White Bear Rod and Club Ehret made motion, seconded by Rosenquist, to consider the supplement to set agenda regarding Mr. Perron's request. All aye. Mr. Perron quoted Section 21 of the Special Use Permit in regards to a variance in the case of undue hardship. After the Special UsP Permit was reinstated, Mr. Perron wanted to bring up the matter now before anyone else did. Mr. Perron then quoted Section 13 (corrected to read Section 9) in regards to the standards of the Pollution Control Agency. Mr. Perron stated that the club would conform to the results of a study being conducted by Mr. Perez. Spitzer stated that Mr. Perron would like a change from the 40 decibels as stated in Section 9, but has not submitted any new number. Mr.. Perron stated that he was not sure how he could come up with a figure. Peltier submitted two letters for consideration from International Acoustical Testing Laboratories, dated December 41 1973 and February 8, 1974, regarding reports on sound level survey conducted at the proposed site of the White Bear Rod and gun Club. Chairman Spitzer read said letters, and asked they be made part of our current file. Gillen stated that variance request should read modification of Section 89 not deletion. Chairman Spitzer itemized what information Mr. Perron would need before a variance could be considered: 1 — on what hardship basis is Mr. Perron asking for a variance, 2 — make a specific request in terms of peak amplitude at property .line, 3 — how peak amplitude will be measured with expert testimony supporting methods, and 4 — that noise levels should be compared in neighborhood in conjunction with other noises occurring at various times of the year. After data has been compiled, Mr. Perron should file an application for variance to the Special Use Permit, and submit to the Planning Commission for review. A Public Hearing will then be in order. Secretary instructed to submit a (See insert for correction added to the above)