My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-14-2004 Planning Comm. Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
10-14-2004 Planning Comm. Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2008 10:34:09 AM
Creation date
7/16/2008 9:44:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OL TI3E I2CGULAR MEETING <br />PLANNING COMM. ISSION <br />LITTLE CANADA, MINN>:;SOTA <br />OCTOBER 14, 2004 <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the Planning <br />Commmission of Little Canada, Minnesota was held on the ] 4th day of <br />October, 2004 in the Council Chambers of the City Center located at 515 <br />Little Canada'~Road in said City. <br />Chair John I{eis called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and the following <br />members of the Planning Commission were present at roll call: <br />PLANNING COMMISSION: <br />ABSENT: <br />ALSO PRESENT: <br />Mr. John Kcis <br />Mr. Scott Barraclough <br />Mi. Tom Duray <br />Mr. Gary Rheuune <br />Mr. Dan Knudsen <br />Ms. I{athy Weihe <br />Mr. Tom Wojcik <br />Mr. Steve Grittman, City Planner <br />MINUTES The September 9, 2004 Planning Commission minutes were approved as <br />submitted. <br />AMENDMENT A representative of Shurgard Self Storage appeared before the Planning <br />TO PUD - Commission requesting approval of an Amendment to PUD to allow <br />55 COUNTY additional directional signage i^ excess of what was initially allowed in <br />ROAD BEAST - the PUD. The representative pointed out that given the multiple <br />SHURGARD buildings on the property and site grades, it has been difficult for <br />SELF STORAGE customers to find the office location. The representative showed various <br />pictures showing the properly layout as well as the proposed directional <br />signage. <br />The City Planner indicated that even with the addition of the directional <br />signage proposed, the property is well below the maximum amount of <br />signage that would be allowed. <br />Barraclough recommended approval of the Amendment to Planned Unit <br />Development allowing the addition of directional signage in excess of <br />what was initially allowed in the PUD for 55 County Road 'B East as <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.