My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/05/2005 EDAC Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Economic Development Advisory Committee
>
Minutes
>
2005
>
05/05/2005 EDAC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2022 3:42:43 PM
Creation date
7/12/2017 10:44:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EDAC
EDAC Document Type
EDAC Minutes
Meeting Date
05/05/2005
EDAC Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />APPROVED <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT <br />ADVISORY COMMITTEE <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />DATE: Thursday, May 5, 2005 <br />MEMBERS <br />PRESENT: J. Schwartz, T. Vacha, S. Rymer (part), B. Combs, K. Corson (part), J. <br />Kuschke, J. Helgemoe, J. Milbauer, K. Hansmann <br />MEMBERS <br />ABSENT: <br />OTHERS <br />PRESENT: M. Divine <br /> <br />GENERAL/MINUTES <br />Minutes of April 7, 2005 were approved. <br /> <br />5-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN <br />Ms. Schwartz reviewed the inventory that was last updated in 2004. She noted in the <br />inventory that the 900 acres of RBR could be impacted by the AUAR. Members <br />discussed the potential stadium site on 35E. Ms. Divine explained that a study was <br />completed in 2003 that looked at the 35E site, but it ranked lower than Blaine. The site <br />that was studied is under contract by another developer. There is other potential land on <br />the 35E corridor that could be assembled for the acreage the Vikings officials are <br />seeking. However, it would be something that would completely change the face of the <br />city, and $$millions in infrastructure improvements would be necessary. <br /> <br />Ms. Divine will add information about the AUAR on 35E and other new development to <br />the inventory. Some Comp Plan assumptions are no longer valid because of tax <br />restructuring. Ms. Divine will review what goals from the Comp Plan are still valid. <br /> <br />Mr. Corson asked if there was still a deadlock on the city council to update the Comp <br />Plan. At this point, the Comp Plan won’t be changed until the minority on the council is <br />convinced the citizens want it changed. Ms. Kuschke asked if the higher density on 35E <br />would meet the goals for multi-family in the Comp Plan. Ms. Divine stated the types of <br />uses proposed—higher density and commercial—will require the Comp Plan to be <br />amended. The Comp Plan does allow high and medium density housing on 35E. <br />However, the development proposed has more commercial and housing instead of <br />industrial. The multi-family and rental assumptions in the current Comp Plan are <br />probably not achievable because of the limited amount of land designated for those uses. <br />Ms. Hansmann stated that through the AUAR process, they learned it would take 160 <br />years to develop that industrial land on 35E, so there is too much industrial land. <br /> <br />Mr. Milbauer moved to remove the outdated assumptions in the inventory, and change <br />language “to continue to support the Comp Plan, recognizing that due to market
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.