Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />FEBRUARY 10, 1982 <br />PAGE 3 <br />~' <br />i <br />prohibit the "local investors" concept which the Storer firm has elected CABLE TV <br />to utilize. He also stressed the fact that Storer has stated in their (cont.) <br />proposal that they will not put down a list of public access items which <br />they will provide, but will give $500,000 and the commission can decide <br />on the specifics. Councilmember Eggert explained-that the RFP did <br />give a basic outline of what is desired in the system (in regard to <br />public access) and both of the other bidders have addressed the matter <br />in their proposals. He suggested that, if .Storer is awarded the franchise, <br />Council carefully examine the matter and decide whether or not to reserve <br />the 5~ franchise fee or a portion of-the $500,000 for the City's own <br />dispensation. Councilmember Larson inquired as to what would happen if <br />Falcon Heights votes against the awarding of the franchise. Council- <br />member Eggert stated it would create a problem because Falcon Heights <br />would be unable to obtain a sophisticated cable system if going it <br />alone. <br />Councilmember Ciernia reminded those in attendance that the School SCHOOL CLOSING <br />Board, at their February 11th meeting, will be voting on which school DISCUSSION <br />to close. Since the Falcon Heights Elementary School is one of the <br />schools being considered for closing many residents are concerned about <br />the future use of the building. Several Councilmembers had received <br />calls from residents inquiring as to whether or-not the building could <br />be used for a City Hall or if the land would be purchased by the City <br />for some other use. Councilmember Larson said she explained that <br />there was no mention of the school closing at the time the new <br />City facility was planned and that the school would not be practical <br />for a City Hall for several reasons such as the building is not <br />energy efficient and the cost would be exorbitant. Councilmember <br />Chestovich felt that, perhaps, the City would be approached in re- <br />gard to purchasing the property and Mayor Warkentien replied that he <br />had talked to school officials and he did not think the City would <br />be contacted regarding purchase of the property. <br />The Fourth Quarter, 1981 Prosecuting Attorney's Report was noted. <br />Mayor Warkentien moved, seconded by Councilmember Larson, that the <br />Clerk Administrator be authorized to cancel Check ~~14402 in the amount <br />of $500.00 (check issued to•Aznerican Shelter - to be re-issued to <br />Hermes for easement strip). Motion carried unanimously. <br />PROSECUTOR'S <br />4TH QUARTER/8 <br />REPORT NOTED <br />CHECK ~I4402 <br />CANCELLID <br />Councilmember Ciernia inquired as to the progress on the land-purchase. CITY HALL SIT. <br />Attorney Swanson informed that the "quick take" should have been settled UPDATE <br />today (2/10/81) but he was having trouble getting the "quick take" deed <br />signed. The '_'quick take" agreement will allow the City to go on the <br />land but the ultimate cost of the property will be determined by the' <br />condemnation. <br />Clerk Administrator Barnes informed Council that Westland Construction GROUND BREAfi- <br />has requested a date be set for the ground breaking for the new City ING DISCUSSION <br />building. After a discussion Council agreed that it was too early to <br />set a date and that when the time is right the Clerk Administrator should <br />notify Council by phone. <br />