My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCMin_68Apr25
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
196x
>
1968
>
CCMin_68Apr25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 8:59:37 AM
Creation date
6/22/2009 9:17:30 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2708 <br />Everett Holes 1771 Fry, inquired as to how many <br />names were on the petition to make Fry Street a <br />one-away and answer was that nine families had <br />signed. <br />Dale Bergstedt, 1659 Maple Knoll Drive asked if <br />there was a chance of appeal to the State Highway <br />Department as regards the ~N© U Turns restriction <br />on Larpenteur Avenue at Frye and also, why the <br />village could not have the right to take action <br />on this. Snyker stated the No U Turn regulation <br />by the State Highway Department does serve a <br />purpose. because there are about 18000 vehicles <br />that are involved and because of the fact that <br />most cars have to cross four lanes of traffic to <br />make the U turns this is a hazard. <br />Paul Loomis, 1687 Fry Street, stated it is not <br />necessary to cross four lanes - he has a full size <br />Chevrolet and he can make U turn from left lane <br />and wind u.p going opposite direction without crossing <br />four lanes. Lemberg stated it was impossible with <br />his car. Loomis claimed this was dust as safe as <br />having to go up to St. Maryts Street to make U turn. <br />Furthers he couldntt see any logical reason for not <br />cutting the median strip opposite the exit from the <br />parking lot. <br />Snyker stated that when the road was first laid out <br />f®deral moneys were used and roa was built as <br />specified. To introduce media~iu~or apartments to <br />cross over would not b® approved by the state - it <br />is hazardous. The cut for the village hall parking <br />lot was in the original plans, was removed when left <br />turn lanes were constructed last year, and at this <br />time is merely being replaced. The traffic crossing <br />at that point is almost always not during the peak <br />traffic periods, <br />E.H. Leonard, 1767-Fry Street, asked how many accidents <br />have occurred at these points - and answer was that <br />there are no figures available at the present tim®. <br />Suggestion was made to construct driveway between the <br />apartment buildings to the harking lot. <br />Mel Spiegler~stated that originally there were to be <br />102 apartment units with one parking space per unit <br />and after court case, etc. they compromised and built <br />68 apartment units and there are 85 to 90 parking <br />spaces. He tried to get the State to cut the median <br />at the entrance to parking lot because no one wanted <br />an entrance to Fry Street. He stated that Dahlgren~ <br />village planner_at that time,, showed him just how he <br />wanted it. Spieglers were not particularly happy with <br />the plans but went along. bast year small driveway <br />eras planned on the north side of 1717 Fry Street to <br />make it possible to drive in and back out and use that <br />instead of residential driveways. That was dropped <br />after home-owner affected at 1725 Fry objected because <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.