CCMin_69Mar13 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Sriyker: The $11.x,000 would be increased by the water on Roselawn if the County did not go in. 2868 Councilman Black: You have been involved with Roseville on the matter of price and have been exceedingly successful in getting low terms. Would you think that they would consider a maximum of $10,000. Engineer Lemberg: I would say this is the price we are down to. It just is not going any farther. I didn't even put it into writing until it came down to $350. I don't see why it would have to come down. Larry Buegler: We are hereinafter immune from the St. Anthony System for the part that will have to put in on general taxes? We are still liable to general tax though. Attorney Seed: It is not impossible, legally, that sometime in the future th eDillage might assume a larger share out of general funds. Larry Buegler: That is no guarantee that the proportion of such future cost could be chan~dby a different council. Attorney Seed: I am pretty sure that you are overplaying this. You can't guarantee anything in this world. Mr. Sn®ker: If this developed into a dog fight, then the County would step out and let the villages pay the $1.0,000 for the road right-of-way. The County could turn Roselawn over to the Villages and it would no longer be a County Road. Mr. Joyce: General tax assessments are tax deductible and property tax assessments are not. Councilman Black: People wanted us to place a higher assessment on the School area in the NE project, but we couldn't do that because they didn't contribute at~y more water than any other property. Engineer Lemberg: Roseville bills $350 per lot and the Village will refigure this in terms of net cost . Warkentien asked for a show of hands for the minimum project. Of those present, eight voted for the project and nine were against it. Stone moved that the Village proceed with the proposal on the basis of the minimum plan to provide access and drainage as shown on Sheet 16 of 23 of Roseville's plans. Taylor seconded. The following vote was recorded: Warkentien - No, Taylor -Yes, Councilmen Stone - Yes, Black - Yes and Ecklund - No. The Attorney advised that for such a Council initiated project a ?~/5 vote must be received. He also stated that if 35~ of the benefited property owners would petition then only a majority vote wound be needed. Warkentien moved that the motion to adopt the resolution be reconsidered. Stone seconded. The following vote was recorded: Warkentien - Yes, Taylor - Yes, Councilmen Stone - Yes, Black - Yes, Ecklund - No. Stone again moved adoption of the following resolution: