Laserfiche WebLink
1933 <br />throughout the Village. There is no place to run storm searers. We would have to <br />go into a combined program with Roseville, the Slats Fair Grounds, and the University <br />of Minnesota. To bring these four organizations together takes a lot of work and <br />study and the others are not available to listen to this. <br />Jan L. Jansen <br />1610 Maple Knolls I understand the Maple Knoll has a water main in. Is it the <br /> intention to assess us again at the same rate? <br />Attorney Galvin: The notices were sent out to P~aple Kno17. because it appears <br /> from preliminary engineering studies that there will be a <br /> benefit to that area in that increased water pressure will <br /> result. No assessment on a front foot basis there, but that <br /> i.s nor hooked up to the East side of the Village, which will <br /> be closed off and you will be hooked up to the West side of <br /> the Village with better service and higher pressure resulting. <br /> An assessment charge against the homes on a basis substantially <br /> less than the homes involved i.n the other proceedings, Not a <br /> frontage basis but a hook up charge. In this particular <br /> instance, the matter had been discussed at a previous meeting <br /> and I think the Council. stated a hook up charge to those homes <br /> for the increase in pressure. <br />Jansen: What would the benefit be to that particular area? <br />Lemberg: You have 1~ meters noon. You could sooitch over to 3/}an meters <br /> and the cost to you for the hook up charge would be taken <br />- <br /> care of by fine opportunity of reducing your <br />sewer rental <br /> cost. <br />Jansen: Has there been any indication as to what this might cost? <br />N31sen: Based upon-,the future development West of Snelling, and eorr- <br /> sidering the vacant property, a survey was made considering <br /> the estimated number of residences. A connection charge was <br /> established. The rate for 3/~." meter - X60.00 <br />L. E. Vanek To the engineer regarding pipe and servicing. There is a <br />1665 Gard®n Ave.: 6~ main that comes by my house. <br />Lemberg: 3/4to meters would reduce your sewer rental rate. <br />Paul Miller M.Y' understand3.ng is that the enti>~e charge for that area i.s <br />lb5t~ Maple Knoll: X860.00. <br />Nilsen: For those homes presently connected -yes. <br />Miller: There is a ds~ water main - I have a 1" meter, would X860.00 be <br />divided among all the property sooners? <br />Nilsens To those presently connected. To those not connected, putting <br />a nene~ serv3.ee on a home, the charge would be $60.00. <br />E. Hales T~Te built a house three years ago and put in a water system, <br />1771 Frye and therefore, I am against this, Hewever, i.f the water i.s <br />put in on one side of the street, would a feeder line be brought <br />across the strut to each lot as part of this assessment, or <br />would each individual. on the opposite side of the street have <br />to make a connection? ' <br />