CCMin_66Mar9 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

23ts6 made by :Art Lindig on the 23rd day of February 1966 for use of that property described as Lot 1, Block 1, Lindig First Addition located north of and adjacent to Lindig's Greenhouse at 1875 West Larpenteur Avenue which property is presently zoned as R-3, all under the provisions of Sec. 16.05, Ordinance No. 64 of the Village of Falcon Heights for the reason followings 1. Said variance is not in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Ordinance and comprehensive plan of the Village of Falcon Heights. Motion was duly seconded by Stone and upon a vote being taken, the following voted for sames Nilsen , Black, Warkentien and Stone and the following voted against sames None. Whereupon said resolution was adopted by the Council.. Damage to Police Council was advised that minor claim against Standard Oil Car by employee Station at 1697 North Snelling Avenue was denied by insurance of Standard Oil carrier, therefore, damages amounting to X21.11 on the Village Stations police car remain unpaid. Warkentien was requested to contact Garnet Gallimore, manager of said station, in an effort to settle. Dog Control It was moved by Black, seconded by Warkentien that the Village Resolutions Council adopt the following resolution regarding the keeping of dogs within the Village of Falcon Heights WHEREAS, the Village of Falcon Heights has adopted an ordinance Registering and Regulating the Keeping of Dogs in said Village, being Ordinance No. 39, adopted April 11, 1956, and WHEREAS, under the provisions of Section 1!~ of said Ordinance, the Falcon Heights Village Council is authorized to enact a resolution prohibiting, for a given time, any and all dogs from running at large in said Village, NOw, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that any and all dogs are prohibited from running at large in the Village of Falcon Heights from April 1st to September 30th, 1966 inclusive. A dog is deemed "at large" whenever it is off the property of his owner or keeper and not under restraint. Such dog shall be deemed under restraint only when it i~ controlled by a leash not exceeding 6 feet in length, or it is at "heel" beside a competent person having custody of him and obedient to that person's commands, or within a vehicle being driven or pushed on a public street or within the property limits of his owner's premises. An unattended dog on the property of another, without the consent of such property owner is "at large" and not under restraint even though he is on a leash. Upon a vote being taken, the following voted in favor of sames Nilsen, Stone, Warkentien and Black and the following voted against same: None. Motion was carried.