Laserfiche WebLink
,.--~ -~ ~ <br />The westerly 285 feet of lot 8, Annie L. <br />Hendrickson's Acre Lots, Ramsey County, Village of Falcon <br />Heights, ~dinnesc~ta, excepting from said tract the follow- <br />ing described parts <br />(1) The North 850 feet of said tract; <br />(2) The Pest 60 feet of the South 195 feet of said <br />tract; and <br />(3) The South 179 feet of said tract lying easterly <br />of the westerly 60 feet of said tract <br />be rezoned from Business District to Residence District <br />"A", "Subject to the present non-conforming use". All <br />persons interested in said proposed rezoning are hereby ad- <br />vised to attend the hearing at said time and place and to <br />participate in the said meeting. <br />Seconded by Shavor and unanimously carried. <br />Johnson, Architect for Spiegler Company, said they would like <br />to have the Planning Commission consider the neW proposed lay- <br />out at the same time they consider the petition. They would ' <br />like to see if the Planning Commission has any other require- <br />ments~ and if-so, they will trg to work them out. In the new <br />plan, they have taken out the access to Fry Street, cut the <br />number of units dawn to 68, set parking back 30~, provided <br />18,lt08 square feet of fenced recreation area. The set back <br />from Fry Street is !t0'. There are 31~ between buildings and <br />they have provided off street parking spaces folt 8!~ cars <br />which equals 1.24 cars per unit. Of the 68 units, !t8 will be <br />2-bedroom and 20 will be 1-bedroom. They will provide land- <br />scaping and screening both on the front and on the north. <br />They would prefer public water, but if not available, they <br />would install individual pumps for each building. They could <br />cut down 1~ between buildings and leave a larger space to the <br />north. <br />Karstad objected to presenting new plan to the Planning <br />Commission along with the petition. He said their group had <br />been promised-that they would be included in any discussion <br />Kith the Planning Commission. He was told they would be at <br />the Public Hearing. Korstad said they have quite a few ob- <br />~ectians to the newly proposed plan and they have other plans <br />to discuss with the Cauncil and Planning Commission. Korstad <br />said he didn't think the petition should be tied up with <br />apartment or drive-in plans. <br />Membrez said to .divorce the newly proposed plan from the peti- <br />tion would be a strange thing. They are not compromising - <br />they have gone all out to overcome previous objections. Tha <br />new buildings will coat between six-hundred-thousand and <br />three-quarters of a million dollars, including equipment. To <br />present the new plan and the petition separately would 3ust <br />be wasting the Planning Commission's time. <br />Utecht summarized: We have a petition for rezoning, one re- <br />vised plan, and requests for building permits. The petition <br />and the revised plan are to be referred to the Planning Comm- <br />ission. The Council can decide on Building Permits after <br />the other two questions are settled. <br />