CCMin_86May28 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAY 28, 1986 PAGE 2 discussed the possible license fees for the operation and whether or not there should be a special category. Tony Hunt, Bullseye Golf, indicated they would not ob~eet to licensing rather than issuance of a conditional use. There being no others wishing to be heard Baldwin closed the hearing at 7:27 P.M. Chenoweth moved, seconded by Wallin, extension of the existing temporary conditional use to June 13, 1986. Motion carried unanimously. The matter will be finalized at the June 11, 1986 meeting. REQIIESTS FOR SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT NORTH OF LINDIG CUL-DE-SAC Baldwin reviewed the history of the Lindig extension and explained that Council had previously expressed opposition to "piece-meal" development in the area. Schroeder reviewed City Code relating to subdivision and the procedure to be followed, after which Council reviewed a map of the area, and discussed drainage and extension of utilities. FRANK EVANS, 187 FAIRVIEW, asked if the three proposed houses would require a holding pond as residents on Fairview and Tatum have expressed concern. RICK GAUGER, 1815 FAIRVIEW, felt that with development of the area some residents would gain, but with the loss of the back half of his lot his property would lose value and he would expect reimbursement. MALCOLM MACGREGOR, representing IRENE MACGREGOR, 1795 FAIRVIEW, commented on the fast that the people to the north were never guaranteed there would not be development in the area, Mrs. MacGregor has entered into a purchase agreement on her lot for construction of a new home, which would not impinge on other properties, and stressed the rights of persons wishing to sell build should be considered. SPING LIN, 1785 FAIRVIEW, stated when he purchased his home they liked the rural setting and no thought of future sale, but after the Brown property was subdivided the rural look was lost. Mr. Lin felt that since Counoil allowed subdivision and construction on the Brown property, subdivision of his lot should be allowed also. G.H. BEHRENS, 1816 TATUM, informed that since the houses went in on the Brown lots it took the boy out of gardening and he would like to put a nice home next to them. Mr. Behrens indicated he was in Favor of allowing construction of the three homes. NANCY WINKEL, 1825 FAIRVIEW, asked about the need for a holding pond when much of the water in the "no-build" area had apparently been diverted to the present storm sewer. IRENE MACGREGOR, 1795 FAIRVIEW, commented on the "piece-meal" development and felt that her property was left as part of the piece when the Brown property was developed, and the construction of a home on the lot would fill out that corner. Council discussed pros and eons on installing full services to the area, reduction of the "no build" area as a result of the installation of the Good Value/Hewlett Packard and Tatum storm sewers, and the possibility of allowing oonstruotion on the lots to round out the area to the eul-de-sae. `t