My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCMin_56Apr11
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
195x
>
1956
>
CCMin_56Apr11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2009 3:23:35 PM
Creation date
6/24/2009 2:11:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ss~ <br />Proposed Consideration was then given to the proposed Dog Registration <br />Dog Ordinance ordinance. A summary of the proposed ordinance, as prepared <br />by the Village attorney, was read for the information of some <br />thirty citizens who were in attendance. The P~ayor asked if <br />anyone wished to be heard. <br />Sumner E. Hood, <br />1597 Hollywood Ct. urged that the proposed ordinance be strengthened to restrict <br />dogs from running at large, at least during the summer months. <br />Richard Pantzar, i~ asked how the ordinance is going to be policed where an <br />-1865 Snelling Av. N. owner keeps .his dogs on his own property as he does. <br />Leonard Beatty, Sr., said that anyone raising puppies cannot safely take them <br />1808 Asbury from the mother dog until the puppies are. six weeks old. <br />He said the owner would have to sell them, destroy them or <br />give them away at a big loss without sufficient time. <br />Ben W. Wilson, said he has resided in Falcon Heights for 11 years and has <br />1835 Simpson owned two dogs all that time, that they never have been on <br />the street unless on leash. Wilson said the w~ d "habitual" <br />_ should be eliminated from the ordinance so dogs could not <br />run at large at all. <br />Priscilla Nelson said she agreed with Pdr. Wilson. As to a kennel, she said <br />1627 Hollywood Ct. she owned four puppies each four months old, that she doesn't <br />like to sell puppies too young, and thinks six months time <br />should be given. l~rs. Nelson said she received no complaints <br />about her dogs. <br />W.H. Deubner, thought the dog registration f ce was a little stiff, and <br />1859 N. Snelling suggested changing the defini#~ion of a kennel from more than <br />two dogs to six or ten dogs. He said that Mrs. Deubner <br />rather than give up her three little dogs would give up her <br />home. <br />Walter Rand, said he was very much in favor of the proposed ordinance <br />1527 California Ave.W. and commended the council for beginning something in the way <br />of as ..dog ordinance. <br />J.F. Dixon, said he was in agreement with the proposed ordinance and <br />1l~95 ~4T. California the leashing requirement. <br />George Geist said that all dogs should be leashed or kept on the owner's <br />1873 N. Simpson property, but wondered what would happen to people with more <br /> than two dogs. Geist said he owns three dogs and that one is <br /> old and. blind. Agreed dogs should be registered, but thought <br /> a X35.00 kennel license fee was out of line and that the <br /> ordinance should state more than four doge constitutes a <br /> kennel. Said if puppies must be sold at three months, the <br /> owner would not come out even. <br />Donald J. Peterson, said he was in agreement with the proposed ordinance, that <br />1625 Hollywood Ct. he lives next door to Priscilla Nelson, that her dogs are <br /> restricted and not allowed to run at large, but that he favors <br /> limiting an owner to two dogs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.