My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCAgenda_90Apr25_wksp
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda Packets
>
199x
>
1990
>
CCAgenda_90Apr25_wksp
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2009 4:44:50 PM
Creation date
7/6/2009 9:59:12 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment A <br />MEMORA:iDUM <br />i <br />T0: Jan Wiessner, City Administrator <br />FROM: Carol Carlson, Adm Intern <br />DATE: April 19, 1990 <br />SUBJECT: Pool Ordinance <br />The City Council identified three issues regarding the proposed amendments <br />to the pool ordinance. <br />1. Whether the four foot fence height requirement should be <br />five or six feet. <br />Z. Whether a construction fence is required for an above ground <br />pool if it is above four feet in height. <br />3. Whether a pool fence is needed if the access ladder to the pool <br />is locked. <br />I contacted Mr. Milt Bellin, Engineering Unit Leader, Division of Environmental <br />Health, Minnesota Dept. of Health and Mr. Michael Godfrey, State Building Code <br />Division. <br />Hei ht <br />Mr. Bellin stated that the State is changing the required fencing height of <br />four feet to five or six feet -for public swimming pools. He suggested a <br />five foot fence. Mr. Godfrey stated that the majority of cities have four foot <br />fences. He stated that the State Building Code does not regulate height of <br />fences or control of access to the pool - that is under local regulation. Also, <br />local regulation controls pool set back distances to property lines, noise, and <br />lighting. <br />Type <br />Also discussed was the type of fence. Mr. Bellin suggested the ordinance <br />include chain-link fencing, if it is two-inch mesh or less and spacing of <br />four inches between pickets on picket fences. Mr. Godfrey agreed with this. <br />Above-ground Pools <br />The issue of whether a pool needs to be fenced if it is an above ground pool <br />with a removable ladder was also reviewed. Mr. Godfrey stated that a removable <br />or even a retractable ladder would not meet the intent of the Code as it is <br />generally left down. The access to the pool has to be fenced to prevent uncon- <br />trolled entry and since ladders are generally down, it would present an oppor- <br />tunity for entry. <br />Construe ion Fences <br />• Mr. Godfrey and Mr. Bellin.a.greed that a construction fence should. be required <br />for pools, if there is no perimeter fence and the pool is being filled during <br />construction. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.