Laserfiche WebLink
Things to consider in evaluating police proposals. <br /> Service: (Six criteria identified by the community.) <br /> quick response to emergencies <br /> teamwork with fire /rescue <br /> visibility and patrol of neighborhood streets and parks <br /> friendly and accessible police personnel <br /> partnership in crime prevention <br /> commitment to the community <br /> Cost: <br /> Assume the proposed costs are accurate and fair. <br /> Affordable All proposals will affect the budget. Staff has some budget reallocation ideas <br /> in the attachments. This will be part of the 1995 budget process. <br /> There may be possible savings from sharing services with Lauderdale or additional fine <br /> revenue collected from more public safety /traffic enforcement with some police <br /> organizations. <br /> Other: <br /> directness of communication with and influence upon the organization <br /> significance of the commitment from the provider <br /> length of experience in community policing <br /> similarity in city styles and police activity profiles <br /> breadth of expertise available <br /> ATTACHMENTS: (The request for proposals were distributed earlier.) <br /> A Materials distributed to the public on the proposals tonight <br /> B Responses to question 1 on survey regarding desired services <br /> C Police activity data (crime and arrest stats) for cities <br /> D Memo from administrator summarizing book on policing <br /> E Graph of cost comparisons <br /> F Summary of possible revenue /savings in 1995 budget <br /> G Possible questions of providers <br /> ACTION REQUESTED: <br /> 1. PRESENTATIONS AND QUESTIONS <br /> 2. DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION <br /> 3. DIRECT MAYOR AND ADMINISTRATOR ON NEXT STEP <br />