Laserfiche WebLink
N1,INUTTS <br />CITY COUNCiI., <br />MAI2CI3 23, 2005 <br />'Che foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Montour. <br />Ayes (5) I_,aValle, Montour, i3lesener, Allan, Keis. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />PARKING Blesener reported that he reviewed the listing of streets outlined in the <br />RhGULA'CIONS former Public ANorks Directors memo dated July 21, 2000 relative to the <br />posting ofi these streets as no parking. In reviewing that listing, Blesener <br />felt that consideration should be given Yo changing the parking restrictions <br />on the following streets to only one side: <br />Arcade Street (County Road D to Keller Parkway) <br />McMenemy Street (Little Canada Road Yo Viking Drive) <br />Viking Drive (McMenemy Road to Edgerton Street) <br />County 12oad I3-2 (Ed~.;erton Street to Arcade Street) <br />131esencr further indicated that his feeling is that traffic safety should be <br />the criteria used for making a decision on whether or not to post parking <br />restrictions on a street, not because the street has been designated as part <br />of the ('ity's trail system. <br />Le Valle noted that there will be increased traffic on the City's streets as <br />the result of the Unweave the Weave project. The Administrator felt that <br />project will result in a dramatic increase in traffc on City streets. <br />Allan agreed that only one side of McMenemy Road and Viking Drive <br />needed to be posted as no parking. She suggested that the west side of <br />McMenemy Road be posted no parking and the south side of Viking Drive <br />be posted es no perking. <br />Blesener felt there was the need to post the east side of McMenemy Road <br />in the area of Sextant as no parking to ensure adequate u~afl5c visibility. <br />I<eis asked if 131esener felt there would be a lot of on-street parking on <br />these sweets. Blesener did not feel there would be, but again stated that <br />whether or not to post streets as no parking should be done from a Yraffic <br />safety standpoint and not ti~om a trail standpoint. <br />LaValle felt that any streets that ~n~ill be impacted from the increased <br />tralf c from Unweave the Weave should remain posted as no parking until <br />the completion oi'that project. <br />Allan suggested getting the input from the Parks & Recreation <br />Commission and the Sheritfis Department on this issue. Blesener that he <br />la~ows the Parks & Recreation Commission will recommend retaining the <br />no parking designation <~iven the use of this sheet for on-sheet trails. <br />8 <br />