Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MAY 25, 2005 <br />However, since the County's and St. Paul's health departments have <br />combined, it is more difficult to geC the needed attention from the County. <br />The Administrator reported that he has reviewed a number of multi-family <br />housing licensing and maintenance ordinances adopted by cities, and <br />included the Brooklyn Center and Brooklyn Park ordinances for the <br />Council review. Brooklyn Park's ordinance has an extensive inspection <br />program to ensure that rental units are maintained in good condition. <br />They also have a "disorderly premise" provision which establishes a <br />correction process to address problems and puts the multi-family license in <br />jeopardy for not resolving problems. <br />The Administrator reported that the Brooklyn Center ordinance is similar <br />to Brooklyn Park's, however; it establishes a "provisional license" for a <br />complex that does not meet the appropriate standards. The provisional <br />license requires that a complex submit a "mitigation plan" for resolving <br />problems which must be reviewed and approved by the city council. If a <br />complex does not comply with the approved mitigation plan, its license <br />can be suspended, revoked or declined to be renewed. <br />The Administrator reported that the City of New Brighton has had a <br />housing maintenance standard ordinance on the books since the 1970's <br />and have indicated that it has made a big difference in improving housing <br />maintenance in their city. New BrighCOn added a provisional licensing <br />provision to this ordinance within Che last two years, which has also <br />helped get all their multi-family properties in compliance. <br />LaValle asked if the City could adopt a fee that is based on calls per <br />service similar to what was done for the ALC. The City Administrator <br />replied that the provisional license does this. He noted that Brooklyn Park <br />initially adopted a tiered sysCem, and the higher the calls per service, the <br />higher the license fee. However, it has since been removed from their <br />ordinance after a legal challenge. <br />Allan noted the information provided by the Administrator which <br />indicates Chat the City cannot factor in domestic calls and child <br />endangerment calls in relaCion to amulti-family licensing fee. The City <br />Administrator pointed out that even factoring out Chose types of calls, the <br />calls for service at Montreal Courts and The Provinces exceed an <br />acceptable level. <br />Ruettimann noted that in looking at the number of serious calls at these <br />complexes, the fact that there are typically two squads responding as well <br />as other supplemental resources must also be factored in. RueCYimann felt <br />that the number of calls for service could be significantly reduced if these <br />complexes would put in place the recommendations of the Crime-Free <br />