Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 24, 2005 <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2005-8-791-APPROVING THE CONSENT <br />AGENDA WHICH CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING: <br />*APPROVAL OF TEMPORARY LIQUOR LICENSE AND EXEMPT <br />GAMBLING PERMIT FOR ST. JOHN'S CHURCH FALL <br />FESTIVAL; <br />*APPROVAL OF ON-SALE WINE AND ON-SALE 3.2 <br />INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE FOR THE CORNER <br />COFFEE HOUSE FOR LICENSE PERIOD THROUGH JUNE 30, <br />2006; <br />*APPROVAL OF PAY REQUEST FOR TWIN CITY <br />HYDROSEEDING <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Montour. <br />Ayes (5). <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />JACKSON The City Planner reported that the Laborer's District Council is purchasing <br />STREET the former Ruff Cuts building at 81 Little Canada Road. As a resulC of the <br />DRIVEWAY change in use of this building, now utilizing the lower level for office/ <br />ACCESS FOR meeting space, the Council is proposing the addition of a handicapped <br />LABORER'S parking space at the lower level and a curb cut from Jackson Street to <br />DISTRICT access this space. Without the addition of this handicapped space, it <br />COUNCIL would likely be necessary that an elevator would have to be installed in <br />BUILDING the building. <br />Jessica Looman, Laborer's District Council, indicated that they are <br />looking forward to moving into their new location. The Council serves 7 <br />affiliated local unions having a membership of approximately 10,000. <br />Looman reported that there will be 8 staff members at this location <br />conducting regular office hours. Once per month, there are meetings of <br />delegates consisting of 24 additional people. These delegate meetings are <br />also held during regular office hours. The delegate meetings will be held <br />in the lower level of the building. <br />Allan asked about the walkway from the front of the building to the back <br />as shown on the plan. Looman reported that this walkway is actually <br />steps; therefore, providing additional handicapped parking at the upper <br />level and using these steps would not work. Also given the limited <br />distance in which to work, it is not feasible to replace the steps with a <br />ramp. <br />]0 <br />