05-13-2004 Planning Comm. Agenda

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL APRIL 28, 2004 connection at a fair price, there is a process in place that would allow the City to obtain the right-of--way. Fahey stated that he would rather reach a voluntary agreement with the property owners, however. Fahey suggested that if the ponding area could be eliminated, this would free up land for another lot, which may help in the acquisition ofright-of--way to Condit. The City Administrator reported that the City Engineer is working with the Watershed on the issue of the pond and whether or not is can be eliminated. "That information should be available by the May 13`x' Planning Commission meeting. Gordie Howe pointed out that if the pond can be eliminated, there will be additional costs for the increased size of storm sewer piping. Howe reported that he has not yet obtained an answer from the City Engineer on the pond issue_ Howe reported that even if he is able to get an additional lot, there will not be enough money to obtain the right-of--way to Condit Street. Howe estimated his lot costs at $97,000 each for this development. Howe pointed out that if townhomes were allowed, the additional density would generate enough to pay for the right-of--way acquisition costs to Condit Street. Howe also pointed out that the townhome market is empty nesters which would result in less traffic and demand on services. Fahey did not believe the neighborhood supported a townhome development. Fahey stated that his position was that the City work with the developer on the issue of the road access to Condit Street. Blesener pointed out that the question is the cost of the additional right-of--way and road improvement. The City Administrator pointed out that the plat as presented complied with the City's Code requirements. However, the City's thoroughfare plan provides for direct access to Condit Street and the neighborhood supports the direct access to Condit Street. The issue is the City's role in securing that access and how would it be paid for. The Administrator indicated that TIF may be an option, however, he is unsure at this point whether the project would qualify for TIF assistance. Staff has not explored this issue in great detail, and the Administrator asked if this is the direction that the Council wants pursued. Fahey indicated that he supported the City's thoroughfare plan for the area as Che preferred development layout. Fahey felt that City staff should explore the options available and report to the Council. Blesener indicated that there is no doubt that a connection to Condit Street is the better route. He agreed that staff should pursue the options.