My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-28-2004 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
04-28-2004 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:37:01 PM
Creation date
7/17/2008 8:57:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />APRIL 28, 2004 <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Montour. <br />Ayes (4) Blesener, Montour, Fahey, Anderson. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />TEXT Mayor Fahey opened the public hearing to consider a Text Amendment <br />AMENDMENT to the Sign Ordinance relative to the number of signs allowed in the <br />TO SIGN General Business Zoning District (B-3). It was noted that the Planning <br />ORDINANCE Commission has recommended approval of the Text Amendment. <br />Fahey asked the impact that adoption of this Text Amendment might have <br />on the rest of the City. The City Planner felt that given there are very few <br />private streets within the City and most of those are located in PUD <br />Districts, the impact of this Text Amendment would be minor. <br />']'here was no one from the general public present wishing to comment on <br />this matter. <br />Upon motion by Blesener, seconded by Montour, the public hearing was <br />closed. <br />Anderson noted that the Text Amendment states that a private street <br />"may" qualify a property as a corner lot. The City Planner indicated that <br />the wording is intended to give the City discretion on a case-by-case basis. <br />The ordinance would allow the Zoning Administrator to make a <br />determination as to whether or not a property is a corner lot for purposes <br />of applying this ordinance. If the property owner disagrees with the <br />interpretation, the property owner could make an appeal to the City <br />Council. <br />Anderson asked if the ordinance would be used for determining corner lot <br />status for any other issue than signs. The City Planner replied that the <br />ordinance is specific to sign determination only, and would not carry over <br />to other issues. <br />Mr. Montour introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOI, UT10N NO. 2004-4-XO - ADOP'T'ING AN ORDINANCE <br />AMENDING CHAPTER 903.770 OF TILE LITTLE CANADA CITY <br />CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, ]3Y PROVIDING <br />FOR THE NUMBER OF SIGNS IN 'T'HE 13-2 THROUGH73-I, I-I, I-2, <br />AND I-P DISTffiCTS <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Blesener. <br />Ayes (4) Montour, Blesener, Fahey, Anderson. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.