My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-2004 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
11-24-2004 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:39:29 PM
Creation date
7/17/2008 9:30:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />NOVEMBER 24, 2004 <br />CITYADAHN]STR,9TOR TO Ea'ICUTE THE ACREFM~NT ON <br />13F_HAI F OP THE CITY <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Blesener. <br />Ayes (5) Montour, Blesener, Fahey, LaValle, Allan. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />TWIN LAKE The City Administrator reviewed his report dated November '19, 2004 <br />BLVD. relative to tine City's sale of its property on Twin Lalce Blvd. He noted <br />PROPERTY that now that water main has been installed in this area, it would be the <br />appropriate time to sell the In~operty for development. The Administrator <br />indicated that issues of consideration include how to market the property, <br />the type/density of development that is preferable, and neighborhood <br />involvement in the process on the fi'ont-end. The Administrator noted that <br />the property lies between single-family development and the Pive Star <br />Mobilehome Parl< in Vadnais Heights as well as is located on a busy <br />street. Therefore, development layout relative to street access will need to <br />be addressed. <br />Fahey stated that he is opposed to any up-zoning of this property. He felt <br />that asingle-family home concept should be presented to the <br />neighborhood. Fahey stated that people bought their homes in reliance on <br />the single-family zoning, and felt there was no need to pursue the <br />development of townhomes on this property. <br />Blesener questioned the feasibility of asingle-family home development <br />given the fact that the property backs up To the mobilehome park as well as <br />is located on a busy road. <br />The City Administrator reconvnended that a neighborhood meeting be <br />held and various development/layout options be presented for discussion <br />purposes. <br />Fahey felt there should be a compelling reason to violate the City's zoning <br />standards pointing out that rezoning this property for townhome <br />development would be spot zoning. <br />"1`he City Administrator felt a rezoning of this property to K-2 would not <br />be spot zoning as the property has R-1 property abutting on only one side. <br />whey agreed, and commented that there is the potential for a transitional <br />zoning given the R-1 property on one side and the mobilehome park on <br />the other. Fahey felt the matter should be studied, a neighborhood <br />meeting held, and a reconunendation presented to the Council. <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.