My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-2004 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
11-24-2004 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:39:29 PM
Creation date
7/17/2008 9:30:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />NOVEMBER 24, 2004 <br />folks Chat the stove does not create a public nuisance. Fahey felt that had <br />building permit been applied for, the City would have done some upfront <br />research to determine whether a stove of this nature was appropriate for <br />the area. Tahey stated that he was in favor of having the professionals <br />conduct a test of this wood burning stove. <br />Blesener indicated that the professionals were present for the testing. <br />Blesener indicated that during the testing the wind changed and the smoke <br />was blown in a couple of different directions. Blesener indicated that <br />while standing outside the odor did not seem that offensive. However, <br />when he got back in his car, he clothes reeked of smoke. Blesener noted <br />that Slumberland has air intake vents on their building, and expressed <br />concern on the impact the wood burning stove has on this building. <br />Blesener stated that he could not, in good faith, vote to approve the stove. <br />Blesener noted that the PCA staff indicated that they can check for <br />opacity, but not for odor. The PCA also indicated that they do not see <br />Chose stoves in Metro cities or near residential areas. <br />There was no one from the general public present wishing to comment on <br />this matter. <br />Montour agreed with Blesener, and felt thaC Cho stove was not designed for <br />the area that it is in. Montour stated that his concern, however, was how <br />in the future does the City handle a complaint about burning in a fire <br />place. Allan indicated that fire places are usually not burning 24 hours per <br />day. Allan indicated that she has smelled the Eros for fro places and the <br />odor is not like this. <br />Uroholski indicated that once the stove is in operation and running <br />continuously, the emission becomes cleaner and the odor lessens. <br />Fahey asked what would preclude a property owner from installing a <br />wood burning stove inside a building. Fahey stated that he can understand <br />why a tree business would want a wood burning stove as a heat source. <br />The City Administrator indicated that there is nothing that would preclude <br />the installation of an interior wood burning stove, other than Che stove <br />would have to meet Code and would require a building permit. In this <br />particular case, a CIJP was necessary as the structure was a pa~~t of the <br />outdoor storage for Precision Tree. "fhe Administrator also indicated that <br />the City rarely gets complaints on odors from fire places. Therefore, this <br />issue isn't likely to be an on-going problem. <br />Blesener noted the size of Precision Tree's wood burning stove. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.