06-24-2003 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL JUNE 24, 2003 that ultimately the remainder of the Inman property and the Lancette property will develop, and he preferred to keep both property owners on an equal playing field. Inman noted that he is proposing to put in the Allan Avenue extension privately at his own expense. As such, he did not believe the cost of the future development of the rest of the property would be increased for the Lancette's. Fahey felt that the issue of the cost of Allan Avenue could be addressed from an equity standpoint at the time the remainder of the Inman property and the Lancette property is developed. Fahey indicated that future development of the area should occur in such a way so as to not create an undue hardship or a benefit for one property owner over the other. Fahey felt that no dedication ofright-of--way for Leeward Way should be required from the Tmnan's at this time, but that a commitment should be required from the Inman's as part of the Development Agreement that at The time Lancette's are ready to develop the Inman's will dedicate the Leeward Way right-of--way. Blesener noted that the Development Agreement should address the location of the two houses that the Inman's want to develop so that the proper setbacks are maintained for the future extension of Leeward Way. Inulan indicated that he was agreeable to that, and noted that the site plan shows the houses with proper setbacks. Debbie Lancette, 791 LaBore Road, noted that the drawing presented this evening was not the one presented to the Planning Commission. The City Planner agreed, and noted that as a result of the discussion at the Planning Commission meeting, the plan presented this evening was developed. Fahey indicated that it is not unusual for plans to be amended as a result of discussion at the Planning Commission with the revised plan then submitted to the City Council. Debbie Lancette indicated that she submitted a letter dated June 20, 2003 to the Council this evening. Lancette expressed concern with the revised plan being considered this evening. She further noted the discussion that occurred at the May 27, I998 Council meeting relative to dedication of Leeward Way right-of--way. The City Administrator noted the Mayor's comment i^ those minutes that as a condition of a property division the City should require an agreement for the Leeward Way right-of--way. The C..ity Administrator indicated That staffs concern is the continued piecemeal development of the area. The Administrator indicated that if the Inman Addition is approved, then it would be staff's position that any further development of the Inman property and the Lancette property