Laserfiche WebLink
NIINUTLS <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JULY 9, 2003 <br />Fahey reported to Mr. Johnson that when he came into the City, he <br />received a call reported that Mr. Johnson wanted to run the property as a <br />railroad distribution yard. This was never represented by Mr. Johnson <br />initially, and now the leasing of outdoor storage space for the unloading of <br />rail cars is just that. <br />Johnson indicated that this is not a true railroad reload business, which <br />typically exists on 6 to 7 acres of property, and that is not his goal. <br />Johnson indicated that the leased outdoor storage would provide for full <br />use of the site which is what will exist in 2 to 3 years anyway as Drywall <br />Supply expands. <br />Anderson pointed out that when the Council discussed the rezoning of the <br />property and decided not to rezone it to I-1, the concern was to control the <br />type and amount of outdoor storage that would be allowed on the site for <br />both now and in the future. That was one of the reasons that the property <br />was rezoned to PUD. Anderson stated that he thought the Council was <br />pretty clear that the City wanted to keep outdoor storage contained and <br />that only the owner of the property would be allowed outdoor storage. <br />Anderson felt the proposed to rent outdoor storage space to another <br />business did not mesh with the PUD zoning for the property. <br />Blesener asked the frequency the lease business would have railroad cars <br />to the site and how long would materials be stored. Johnson indicated that <br />the business interested in the lease is looking fora 2-year commitment. <br />Johnson also anticipated there would be two to three rail cars to the site <br />per day. Johnson also indicated that one rail car load is the equivalent of <br />four tivckloads. Johnson indicated that Drywall Supply would unload the <br />rail cars for the lease business, and while they may truck some of the <br />materials off site, another trucking company would do the majority of the <br />trucking. <br />Anderson pointed out that if the product is similar to Drywall Supply's, it <br />would be difficult to enforce any limitations on the number of rail cars that <br />could deliver product to the site for the lease company. <br />Johnson reviewed pictures of what the operation would look like. <br />Blesener asked if Drywall Supply's product came by rail. Johnson replied <br />that it did and right now he gets four to five rail car deliveries per day. <br />Blesener indicated that he had no problem with the leasing of a portion of <br />the outdoor storage area provided that appropriate parameters are <br />established to control the operation. Fahey indicated that he was opposed <br />6 <br />