Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MARCH 9, 2016 <br />Keis introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOL UTION NO. 2016-3-51— APPR O VE THE FISCAL POLICIES <br />UPDATES AS PRESENTED BY THE CITYADMINISTRA TOR IN <br />HIS STAFF REPORT <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Montour. <br />Ayes (5). <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />2016 WATER & The City Administrator stated that Staff is proposing a three percent <br />SEWER RATE increase in water rates for 2016 to get rates that sustain the Water Fund. <br />ADJUSTMENTS He explained that in 2015, a $28,000 loss was projected for the Water <br />Fund, but it ended up having a profit that was largely attributable to the <br />refund and rate reduction from the St. Paul Regional Water Service. The <br />City Administrator stated that in 2016, St. Paul Regional Water Service is <br />not changing the rates the city pays, and a net loss of $75,509 is projected <br />with no increase in rates. He explained that having a small loss in the <br />water fund has been an acceptable practice as long as we cover our <br />operating costs and the projected transfer of depreciation to the Water & <br />Sewer Capital Replacement Fund. He noted that in order to keep the loss <br />manageable this year and avoid more dramatic increases in the fiiture, staff <br />is proposing a three percent increase in the water rates. The winter rate <br />would increase from $3.20 per 1,000 gallons of water to $3.30, and the <br />summer rate would increase from $3.31 per 1,000 gallons to $3.41. <br />The City Administrator stated the 2015 budgeted loss for the Sewer Utility <br />Fund was $52,520, but it also ended up with a profit. He explained that <br />our sewer rates have been helped in the last few years because of the large <br />reduction in treatment costs paid to the Metropolitan Enviromnental <br />Services during that time. The City Administrator stated that Staff <br />believes the minimum sewer charge is too high for lower volume users. <br />He explained that the current $50 minimum covers usage up to 15,000 <br />gallons, however, users of 6,000 gallons are paying $8.33 per 1,000 <br />gallons of sewer usage versus our rate of $3.58 per 1,000 gallons for users <br />over 15,000 gallons. He stated that disparity is too high, and reviewed the <br />key factors for the Council to consider. The City Administrator stated the <br />option that Staff feels is best consists of implementing a $15 per quarter <br />base fee, a minimum charge including the base fee totaling $43.64 that <br />covers up to 8,000 gallons, and then keeping the per gallons charge at <br />$3.58 per 1,000 for amounts over 8,000 gallons. He explained this would <br />generate additional revenue of $65,500, and reduces minimum charges by <br />13 percent for lower volume accounts. He noted that the downside is that <br />a 15,000 gallon user would see a 37 percent increase their quarterly bill <br />11 <br />