My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-10-2002 Planning Comm. Agenda
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
10-10-2002 Planning Comm. Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2008 1:04:03 PM
Creation date
7/23/2008 11:56:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COA~INIISSfON <br />AUGUST 8, 2002 <br />McDonald indicated that the active pipeline has been completely located. <br />Williams has not completely located the abandoned 6-inch lines, <br />specifically the depth of these lines. McDonald noted that where Preserve <br />Trail crosses the pipeline, that area will all be hand dug. <br />Hartigan again questioned how approvals could be granted without <br />knowing the answers to vital details. <br />Roycraft main noted that he is an avid environmentalist, but pointed out <br />that if a development proposal tits within all requirements, it will likely <br />move on. I-le also noted that the Commission is considering the <br />preliminary plat at this time, and not all questions are necessarily <br />answered at this level of review. However, they will be prior to final plat <br />approval. <br />Hartigan expressed concern about the impact on the wetland noting that 17 <br />new roof's are being added in addition to driveways and two new streets. <br />Hartigan asked where the additional run-off would go. McDonald <br />reported that they have submitted run-off calculations to the Watershed <br />and the City Engineer. Those calculations have been verified by those <br />parties. <br />Pam Brauson, 495 Viking Drive, noted that the interests of the people <br />living in the area have to be considered. She reported that Williams <br />Pipeline was recently in the area marking the pipe and indicated to her that <br />he was not sure which pipe was active and which were not. The Williams <br />Pipeline representative informed her that the pipes Criss-cross, therefore, it <br />is difficult to make this determination. <br />I<eis pointed out that \Nilliams Pipeline has indicated this evening that <br />they will have definite pipe locations and other relevant information prior <br />to final consideration of the plat. <br />The City Administrator acknowledged that this is a complicated project <br />given factors such as the wetland, pipelines, etc. The Administrator noted <br />that while the developer has made good progress on addressing issues <br />related to the Shoreland and Subdivision Ordinances, they have not <br />provided adequate information on the pipeline issues. The Administrator <br />indicated that staff has informed the developers that this information is <br />necessary. The Administrator reported that staff recommends that <br />preliminary plat approval not be granted this evening and that the <br />Williams Pipeline information is necessary given the impact that this <br />information could have on the plat, for example, reduction in number of <br />lot, relocation of road, etc. The Administrator felt there were issues that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.