Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MAY 11, 2016 <br />the antenna setup would also allow the option to install a Wi-Fi connection <br />at the park. <br />The Public Works Director stated that the quote for the camera installation <br />is $3,119, the proposed eight cameras are $750 each, and there is a one- <br />time cost of about $200 for the wireless antenna work. The City's annual <br />camera license fees would be $1,500 for the eight cameras at Pioneer Park, <br />and seven at the public works shop. He explained that the City budgeted <br />$50,000 in 2016 for security cameras throughout the City, and the total <br />cost for the installation of eight cameras at Pioneer Park will be <br />approximately $9,500. <br />Keis asked if spending $9,000 on cameras is worth it when the cost of <br />damage has only been $1,500. The City Administrator stated $1,500 is <br />only the cost of materials to repair the damage. He explained that amount <br />does not account for City Staff time to do the repairs or remove graffiti, or <br />the Sheriff's Department time to take the vandalism reports and do <br />investigations, or the attorneys and court time for prosecutions. He stated <br />that the cameras should be a deterrent, and would help identify and <br />prosecute those responsible. <br />Montour introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTIONNO.2016-5-86 APPROVING THE PURCHASE AND <br />INSTALLATION OF EIGHT SECURITY CAMERAS FOR PIONEER <br />PARKAS PRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FOR <br />A COST OF $9,500. <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by McGraw. <br />Ayes (5). <br />Nays (0). Resolution adopted. <br />RESIDENT <br />Mike Lemke, 2442 Rice Street, Terrace Heights Manufactured Home <br />COMMENT — <br />Park, explained that one day last week as he was leaving for work at <br />REQUEST FOR <br />4:00am, he saw a person who did not live in the park sneaking around the <br />CITY TO <br />back of his neighbor's house, and then jump in a van that came speeding <br />ADOPT AN <br />down the street. He stated that he called 911 and followed the vehicle <br />ORDINANCE <br />until the Sheriff s Deputy arrived and stopped the vehicle. He stated that <br />AGAINST <br />the Deputy contacted hien after stopping the vehicle, and reported that the <br />LURKING <br />occupants were let go because Little Canada does not have a lurking <br />ordinance. Mr. Lemke stated that he was disappointed that the Deputy <br />could not do anything, so he went around the manufactured home park and <br />nearby businesses to gather signatures in support of the City of Little <br />Canada adopting an ordinance against lurking. <br />11 <br />