Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1. The spacing of the buildings results in 64 feet separation from garage to garage. This <br />is the absolute minimum for a private roadway and 20 foot deep driveways – again, the <br />minimum depth for parking a vehicle in the driveway. The Villas project noted above <br />was designed (at the insistence of the City) with 75 feet minimum face-to-face <br />separation. This dimension permits 24 feet of driveway depth, a more realistic parking <br />depth, and a 27 foot roadway which accommodates two way traffic and avoids conflicts <br />with parked vehicles. In addition, this large dimension could accommodate a sidewalk <br />along the private road if considered appropriate. <br /> <br />2. The rear yard area of the townhouses is setback from the rear building line at a <br />dimension of about 10 feet. The units show a patio door existing the structure in that <br />area. 10 feet is a very shallow dimension to accommodate any type of private <br />recreation space without encroaching near the adjoining property. Moreover, the <br />grading plans show significant slopes along the rear line of many of the proposed units, <br />making the patio door effectively useless. There is question whether these slopes <br />would be maintainable – the City typically requires slopes of less than 4:1, whereas <br />some of those shown are 2:1 or steeper. <br /> <br />3. The setback of the property from the rear lot lines of the Iona Lane properties is just 10 <br />feet. It would be common for the City to consider a setback adjoining the rear property <br />line of adjacent property to be no less than the setback imposed for that abutting yard. <br />In this case, the existing rear setback for those abutting homes is more than 100 feet in <br />most cases, with a required setback of at least 30 feet. Placing the townhomes in such <br />a way as to encroach to within 10 feet of the common property line is problematic. <br /> <br />4. The table above identifies a level of green space at 477 square feet per unit for the <br />proposal. However, a significant amount of that space is part of a required stormwater <br />pond area along the east end of the property. The zoning ordinance has a general <br />benchmark for open space of 500 square feet of green area per unit, which applies in <br />multiple family developments. <br /> <br />For these reasons, staff is concerned that the proposed townhomes are too dense for the <br />subject property, even though the density meets the standard threshold for these types of <br />units (one unit per 4,000 square feet of lot area). To proceed, staff would recommend a <br />design that, at minimum, meets the following thresholds: <br /> <br />• 500 square feet of usable green space per unit (exclusive of ponding areas). <br />• 30 setback, minimum, from the abutting single family residential property lines. <br />• 20 setback for rear buildings adjoining non-single family property to provide for usable <br />green space and/or patio/deck development. <br />• Face-to-face building separation of at least 75 feet as discussed above. <br />• Upgraded building materials representative of the intent for PUD development, <br />including brick and stone, cement-board siding (rather than vinyl), and similar. <br />• Landscaping development that creates an enhanced neighborhood environment, <br />buffers the use from the single family neighborhood, and screens private spaces from <br />neighboring land uses. <br />