My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-30-2016 Council Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
11-30-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 10:28:19 AM
Creation date
1/4/2017 2:51:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Follow up: The new proposal shows a setback of 20 feet from the property line shared <br />with the homes on Iona Lane. This is an improvement from the original proposal. The <br />previous two concerns can be satisfied if the building were to be shifted 10 feet to the <br />north, however, this raises new concerns over the slope on the north side of the <br />property. <br /> <br />4. Usable open space. The table above identified a level of green space at 477 square <br />feet per unit for the original proposal. As noted at the time, a significant amount of that <br />space is part of a required stormwater pond area along the east end of the property. <br />The zoning ordinance has a general benchmark for open space of 500 square feet of <br />green area per unit, which applies in multiple family developments. <br /> <br />Follow up: With the reduction in units from 18 to 14, the total open space square <br />footage has been increased to 614 square feet, according to the plans. However, this <br />amount includes the stormwater pond area. The applicants shall submit a separate <br />narrative that shows the usable green space will be 500 square feet per unit or more, <br />exclusive of the ponding area. <br /> <br />Building materials. Staff had requested that the building materials for the PUD be <br />upgraded to be more representative of the intent for a PUD development, including <br />brick and stone, cement-board siding (rather than vinyl), and similar. <br /> <br />Follow up: The new plan set shows a mix of stone, LP lap siding, and shakes on the <br />façade of the buildings. This is an upgrade from the original plan set that showed vinyl <br />siding and shakes on the entire building. However, the sides and rear walls of the <br />building continue to be identified as vinyl. The LP product, or similar, should extend to <br />all sides of the buildings. <br /> <br />Landscaping plan. Staff had also requested a landscaping plan that creates an <br />enhanced neighborhood environment, buffers the use from the single family <br />neighborhood, and screens private spaces from neighboring land uses. <br /> <br />Follow up: The applicants have not submitted an updated landscaping plan. An <br />updated landscaping plan will be necessary before final approval. As part of this plan, <br />private spaces, such as patios accessible from the rear portions of each unit, would <br />need to be shown to illustrate how those spaces work with the proposed grading and <br />drainage, and how they will be landscaped and screened from surrounding property <br />and from each other. <br /> <br />Summary and Recommendation <br /> <br />Overall, the developers have addressed some of the concerns that were raised in the <br />previous report. However, there are still a number of important outstanding issues that should <br />be satisfied before the development stage approval can be considered. These include: <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.