Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP <br />MAY 10, 2017 <br />rezoning solution. Keis asked what the future is across the nation for mobile <br />home parks. He noted that he drove through each of the three parks in Little <br />Canada and did not see many newer homes, most were very old, although many <br />were well maintained. <br />The City Planner stated that the mobile home parks represent a piece of the <br />City's affordable housing stock, but does the Council want to preserve the parks, <br />be neutral, or plan for a land use change in the future. Torkelson stated that he <br />had brought this up during the goal session, and noted that affordable housing is <br />hard to find in the metro area. He reported that Little Canada has a high <br />percentage of rental housing, and he sees a real need for affordable housing <br />here. He stated that he could see the mobile home parks being gone in 10 to 15 <br />years, and the Rice Street reconstruction could affect them. He thinks the two <br />on Rice Street are at higher risk for being sold for redevelopment, and with the <br />current zoning designations, it could easily happen. His concern is the loss of <br />units in general of affordable housing, and would like to see some sort of City <br />policy or direction for the future of the parks. He asked why would the residents <br />put a new trailer, or even put any money into improving their trailer, when the <br />parks' futures are questionable. McGraw stated the other side is that the parks <br />are privately owned, and who is the City to change the zoning and then the <br />property owner cannot do what they thought they could with the land. <br />Torkelson suggested having the discussion about rethinking the City's past <br />attitude of there is enough multi -family housing and we do not want more here, <br />except for senior buildings. He stated that there is a movement now for smaller <br />houses on smaller lots, which are more affordable than the large lots that the <br />City now requires. He explained that younger adults in particular, cannot afford <br />the houses that are here now. <br />The City Planner stated there are some development areas left, and how does the <br />City want to plan for that. The Comprehensive Plan currently has land use <br />designations for these parcels, so the Council should discuss if any of these <br />designations should change with the update. The City Administrator explained <br />that some developments had to build expensive homes because the land <br />assembly costs were high. McGraw stated that the City owes it to the <br />surrounding neighborhood to preserve their property values when considering a <br />new development. <br />The City Administrator reported that The Lincoln Group is waiting to hear if the <br />Council is willing to give them any kind of financial assistance to help their <br />residential development move forward on the Sculley property. Keis stated he <br />does not know that it is the City's job to ensure everyone makes the amount of <br />money they want during a development project. The City Administrator stated <br />that there have been other developments that would not have happened if the <br />City did not step in to some extent. He sees this situation as the same. He stated <br />2 <br />