My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-09-2017 Parks & Rec Packet
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
05-09-2017 Parks & Rec Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 9:20:56 AM
Creation date
5/25/2017 11:34:19 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />moved away, it is very likely that the entire water surface will become choked with water lilies during <br />the summer months in future years of West Savage Lake does not satisfy the DNR definition of a "lake." <br />It is actually a 'marsh" or a "wetland" with very shallow water. The water depth rarely exceeds 10 feet. <br />Over most of the area, it is only 6 feet deep or less, where can touch the lake bottom with boat oars. <br />There are no sunfish, crappies in the lake; only minnows, leeches and frogs that attract egrets; painted <br />turtles and snapping turtles that emerge in June. It is not advisable to wade or swim in the wetland. <br />Because of the fecal matter egested by the large numbers of geese, ducks, and other waterfowl, anyone <br />swimming in the wetland would be at high risk of contracting "swimmers' itch." Leeches are also <br />numerous. A public access to the lake would likely attract more snowmobile riders in the winter. <br />Snowmobile owners from properties abutting the lake already create enough of a nuisance, disturbance <br />of the peace, and destruction of the wildlife habitat on the island during the winter months. Additional <br />numbers of snowmobile riders coming from afar just to race around in circles would be intolerable. <br />Public funds would be better spent on access to an actual "Lake" where boaters would be able to swim, <br />catch fish and not be impeded by water lilies and water weeds. <br /> <br />Horrible idea! This is not a recreational lake; it is an area that at one time was farm field with cows in <br />it. It has become a pond for wild life to take refuge in the metro area. The shoreline is muck. When my <br />children were young they were not even allowed down there without an adult with them because you <br />sink in. You will have children playing in the storm sewer run off that is on Lake Street. To access the <br />lake or pond you want to go through what maybe an easement but is right next to people's homes. To put <br />wood chips on an incline that runs into the lake does not sound like a great idea either. To add parking <br />to an area that was never designed for it, well how would you like it by any of your homes? Roy Nadeau <br />donated the land for Nadeau Park for the area his intent I do not believe was to open up the 2 block <br />area to a pond, and traffic. First I hear the lake should be renamed; now access is needed. People in the <br />neighborhood have always had access if they wanted to go down. What a waste of money!!!! <br /> <br />It would be nice to be able to enjoy the lake in our neighborhood. <br /> <br />Would anticipate use by very few given its limitations, while there are other public access sites on other <br />nearby lakes readily available. Would require annual maintenance. <br /> <br />I'm in favor of this and additional bike and pedestrian trails. <br /> <br />This is a ridiculous idea. While not necessarily opposed to the idea of creating a functional public <br />access point to the lake, we are in opposition to the proposed location and question the purpose for said <br />access. 1. The west half of Savage Lake is by no means a recreational body of water that lends itself to <br />watercraft use as suggested by this survey. Since the wonderful new outlet was installed on the lake's <br />east side, water levels have dropped and the west side of Savage Lake has becomes 100 percent <br />inundated by Lily Pads making unusable in the summer. This is not something that can be easily <br />mitigated as suggested by the city Administrator. This has become a nice deep water wetland; it is not a <br />recreational body of water. 2. Said access point is the shallowest part of the lake (about 12 inches deep) <br />and is rimmed by a thick, 100 feet wide band of Cattail. How would anyone even get to the lake if they <br />had access to it? As the property owner immediately adjacent to and south of this access point, we can't <br />even access the lake any more in the summer for these reasons. 3. Said access would require the <br />removal of a number of trees and would run quite close to the house along its north edge. That in itself <br />should have already dismissed the Lake Street access point as a viable option. In addition, said access
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.