Laserfiche WebLink
n~INUTrs <br />CI'T'Y COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 14, 2002 <br />Administrator also noted that this issue could be addressed at the time <br />consideration is given to the reconsh~uction of Jackson Street. <br />Cahey asked if there was anyone from the general public present wishing <br />to comment on this matter. <br />David Dorn, Jackson Street resident, pointed out existing outdoor storage <br />concerns at the Poolside. site, and asked why there would be reason to <br />believe that situation would be diiTerent. Dorn also pointed out that the <br />Jackson Street residents would like to see the existiu~~ fence on the west <br />side of the property remain. Cahey pointed out that Poolside has indicated <br />that they are agreeable to retaining the fence. <br />I:)orn pointed out that (he Poolside business has been growing over the <br />years and semi h~ucf< trelT°ic has been increasing. Dorn requested that the <br />Poolside sign on Little Cent~~da Road identifying the rear entrance to the <br />property be removed. Stroman in<9icaied (hat Poolside was agreeable to <br />removing the sign. <br />Dorn pointed out that Poolside leases space on the opposite side of <br />Jackson Su~eei and they run a bobcat back and Forth between the two sites. <br />Dorn reported that I''oolside parts this bobcat on Jackson Street. Dorn <br />asl.ed if the use of Jt~tdaon Street for Poolside parking would continue. <br />Fahey replied that Jackson Street could be posted as no parking. <br />Dorn noted that the street has been posted as no parking, but Poolside <br />continues to park there. Dorn ~n~as concerned that oi~itdoor storage and <br />parking violations would continue. Dorn also noted Rob Anderson's <br />comments at the last meeting (hat Poolside could not abide by road <br />restrictions, <br />I'ahey indicated tha( whatever level ol'road restrictions are placed on <br />Jackson Su'eet will have to be abided ~n~ith. This will be an enforcement <br />issue for the Cit>>, but ~~ivcn (he City's limited stal'T; it will have to rely on <br />property o~~mers in the area to report the violations, <br />Dorn again expressed concern about the uaf}ic on Jackson Street, and <br />indicated that he wanted [n ensure his concerns were noted for the record. <br />Fahey felt the concerns expressed this evening ~n~ere justified, but pointed <br />out that the City's Iasi icvie~a~ of the Poolside property occurred i^ 1986. <br />There have been no complaints at the Council level about the Poolside <br />operation for the pass 16 years. <br />t <br />