08-28-2002 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 28, 2002 Kenow stated that it appears that most of the homes proposed as part of the Palmen property development proposal are 30 feet from the pipeline easement. Kenow noted that there are three pipes running through the easement, but these have not been located on the map to show their relationship to the easement. 5calze stated that she would like to see a diagram showing both the easement area and the pipes within that easement. Fahey asked why Mounds View has never adopted a pipeline setback ordinance in light of the tragedy that occurred in that city. Scalze pointed out that these pipelines are now approaching 50 years in age, and this causes a heightened awareness from a safety standpoint. Anderson pointed out the indication that the most damage occurs within 150 feet. He pointed out that damage would be even more intense at 100 feet and 50 feet and so on. Anderson indicated that he liked the Maplewood Ordinance since it established a 100-foot setback from pipelines, but still allowed for variances from that standard depending on the circumstances. Anderson pointed out that without an ordinance, development can be proposed for right up to the easement line. Fahey questioned why the City would want the ability to department fi'om the standards imposed by a pipeline setback ordinance. Anderson felt the City may want that ability as long as public safety was reasonably assured. Fahey pointed out the 150-foot setback distance being proposed by the neighborhood and the fact that there are dozens of homes already constructed near pipelines that would not meet that standard. Fahey also pointed out there is no firm recommendation from the Office of Pipeline Safety on this issue. He also noted the lack of information about setbacks other cities may have adopted, and indicated that he was sure that there is pressure from developers to minimize setbacks and interest by cities in maximizing development. Fahey indicated that it appears from his review of the information presented, that more focus has been given on whether or not contractors working in the areas of pipelines are qualified than there has been on mandating larger setbacks. Anderson indicated that he is certain that Williams Pipeline will say their pipeline is safe. Fahey agreed, and noted that cathodic protection methods are used to ensure the pipeline does not rust. Kenow indicated that one of the responsibilities of the Office of Pipeline Safety is to do periodic inspection of pipelines and ensure that proper maintenance is being done on these lines. 10