Laserfiche WebLink
MINUT)uS <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 28, 2002 <br />Government will be conducting further study of the issue over the next <br />year, and may come out with a specific recommendation. <br />Anderson asked if the Oflice of Pipeline Safety will be proposing any <br />legislation this year. Kenow stated that they will not be proposing <br />legislation for this session. He indicated that they will wait until next year <br />after new Federal legislation comes out. Kenow indicated that in addition <br />to the setback issue, the Federal Government will also be looking into <br />access issues related to emergency vehicles. <br />Fahey did not believe that access was an issue in this particular case. <br />Fahey asked what access concerns the Office of Pipeline Safety has with <br />this particular proposal Kenow indicated that since they have no report or <br />recommendations from Williams Pipeline, they were not sure that <br />Williams will adhere to their standard procedures. <br />Fahey noted that part of his concern is that City does not have all the <br />relevant information, specifically location of the pipeline, easement <br />widths, etc. Fahey indicated, however, that he was not sure that the 150- <br />foot setback being proposed by the neighborhood was reasonable. Fahey <br />asked if any cities have adopted a 150-foot setback. He noted that the City <br />of Maplewood has adopted a 100-foot setback, but allows for variance <br />from that distance for various reasons. <br />Kenow agreed that Maplewood has enacted the 100-foot setback. He <br />noted that his office has had inquiries from other communities about the <br />setback issues, but he does not know if any cities have adopted that 150- <br />foot setback standard. The 150-foot distance came from a determination <br />that this distance is where the most damage occurs. <br />Fahey pointed out that if there is a major leak a distance of 150 feet will <br />not be adequate, and it would be impractical to require a setback of several <br />blocks that might be necessary. <br />Fahey stated that he needs more information before he can make a <br />decision on whether or not to adopt a pipeline setback ordinance. He <br />indicated that he would like to know what standards other cities are <br />adopting. Fahey pointed out that adoption of a 150 foot standard would <br />likely make the Palmen property undevelopable, and unless there are <br />compelling reasons fora 150-foot setback, Fahey indicated that it maybe <br />an unreasonable distance. Scalze stated that she would like to see a <br />diagram showing the pipeline in the City and the distances of existing <br />housing from these pipelines. <br />