Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 28, 2002 <br />RE,SOI, UTION NO. 2002-8-205 - TA737.ING ACTION IN THE <br />PRELIMINARY PL AT PROPOSAL FOR THE PRESERVE PENDING <br />A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING COMMLSSION <br />AND CONTINUING THE PU737.IC HEARING ON THIS MATTER <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Montour. <br />Ayes (5) Scalze, Montour, Fahey, Anderson, LaValle. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />REQUEST FOR Mr. David Crary, Sunset Court, appeared before the Council to request <br />PIPELINE that the City adopt an ordinance imposing a 150-foot setback from <br />ORDINANCE pipelines based on the concern for public safety. Crary reported on the <br />Mounds View disaster in 1987 in which a pipeline blew up. The Mounds <br />View pipeline was a 9-inch line. The pipeline that Crary was concerned <br />about is a 12-inch line. Crary reported that the Of£ce of Pipeline Safety <br />and the State Fire Marshal are recommending a 150-foot setback from <br />pipelines from a public safety standpoint. <br />Fahey indicated that in reviewing the information on pipeline safety, there <br />is the indication that the I50 feet may provide a reasonable safety margin. <br />However, there is no specific distance recommendation. Fahey asked the <br />position of the Office of Pipeline Safety. <br />Charles Kenow, Office of Pipeline Safety, appeared before the Council <br />and reported that State Law allows local communities to pass pipeline <br />ordinances that are more restrictive than State Law. The intent was to <br />allow local communities to consider development and land uses within <br />their communities and enact regulations that would fit the specific <br />community. Since this law was passed, research has been done on <br />pipelines and public safety, and it was determined that the greatest area of <br />damage in the event of a rupture was within 150 feet of the pipeline. <br />Kenow reported that the 150 feet is not a specific recommendation from <br />the Office of Pipeline Safety or the State Fire Marshal, but is research <br />from the report specific to the area of the greatest damage. However, it <br />seems that there are more cases of ruptures occurring recently around the <br />country which Kenow felt suggests the need for greater setbacks than have <br />been imposed in the past. Kenow indicated that the Office of Pipeline <br />Safety is saying that local communities have the authority to enact more <br />stringent standards than provided for by Law. <br />Kenow reported that the Office of Pipeline Safety was created as a result <br />of the Mounds View accident. Kenow stated that his office would <br />encourage Little Canada to look at enacting an ordinance and determine <br />the setback that fits for this community. He also reported that the Federal <br />