Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />OCTOBER 23, 2002 <br />Fahey asked where another line would go if one were to be constructed. McDonell <br />estimated that any additional lines would go to the south of the existing lines given <br />the way the easement is laid out. McDonell also estimated that, at the most, two <br />additional lines could be placed in the easement. <br />McDonell reviewed his next diagram showing the lines at the area of where proposed <br />Preserve Court and Preserve Trail intersect. He noted that the pipes are <br />approximately 4 to 5 feet deep. Again, using a 2 to 1 slope, the area of disturbance <br />would not encroach onto the Palmen property. <br />The third diagram showed the pipe at the western edge of the plat, and again the area <br />of disturbance should it be necessary to make repairs would not encroach into the <br />paved street area. McDonell reported that Williams has no plans to expand, and <br />currently are offering easements for the use of their pipes. <br />Scalze noted that the western edge of the plat is the area of contention and that the <br />Williams easement does extend onto the Palmen property in this location. She noted <br />that staff's recommendation is that the road right-of--way not encroach onto the <br />Williams Pipeline easement. <br />McDonell reported that there is only a slight chance that the road would ever be <br />disturbed due to Williams Pipeline. <br />Fahey noted that the City has no idea of what the likelihood of this would be. He <br />noted that Williams is offering the use of the easement to companies such as World <br />Com, and suggested there may be additional opportunities for disruption within the <br />easement. <br />McDonell pointed out that Williams Pipeline owns the easement and is not interested <br />in letting it go. They have never released any easement and have no intentions of <br />doing so. However, based on the past 50 years and Williams' current methods of <br />operation, McDonell felt that the chances were very slight that the road would ever be <br />disturbed. <br />Scalze pointed out that the City has made two requests for information about the <br />spills that have occurred in this area of the pipeline. Scalze stated that the City has no <br />way of knowing whether or not there was still contamination in this area and whether <br />that contamination would have to be dug up. <br />McDonell reported that they have worked with the Office of Pipeline Safety and <br />Williams Pipeline, and neither have any issues with this development. Fahey pointed <br />out that Williams may say the development is fine, but they are also reserving their <br />right to dig up the road if they need to at no cost to them. Fahey also pointed out the <br />potential that more lines will be added in this easement. <br />