My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-00 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
04-26-00 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2009 2:24:19 PM
Creation date
8/6/2008 10:41:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTT;S <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />APRIL 26, 2000 <br />Jim Klasness, Preferred Builders, agreed that two feet was not enough area <br />toinstall awrap-around deck on the house. That will have an impact on <br />the owners enjoyment of the house, but a deck is something that is not <br />necessary. <br />The City Administrator pointed out that increasing the easement width <br />from 15 feet to 20 feet only moves the easement about 1 '/z feet closer to <br />the house. The rest of the additional easement comes from the north side. <br />Aleks Klidzejs indicated that if it is necessary to have a 20-foot easement, <br />he would offer that 15 feet come from the Mitchell property and the <br />additional 5 feet come from his property. The 5-foot easement area from <br />his property, however, should be limited to construction needs should <br />repairs be necessary. The vehicular access portion of the easement would <br />be limited to the 15 feet on the Mitchell property. <br />Fahey stated that he was not adverse to this suggestion provided there was <br />no cost to the City for acquiring the easement. Fahey suggested that City <br />staff look at the options for the easements, both for acquiring the <br />additional easement from the Klidzejs property as well as moving the 45- <br />foot radius cul-de-sac easement so that it would provide access for the <br />I{lidzejs property to Mitchell Trail. <br />There was no one present from the general public wishing to comment <br />further on this matter. <br />Upon motion by LaValle, seconded by Pedersen, the public hearing was <br />closed. <br />Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 2000-4-700 - '!'A737.INC ACTION ON TILE <br />PROPERTY DIVISION FOR 3240 TWIN LAKE 120AD AND <br />IN,S~TRUCTING THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO PURSUE <br />EASEMENT OPTIONS FOR 130TH THE SANITARY SEWER <br />EASEMENT AS WELL A.S THE MITCHELL TRA77 CUL-DE-SAC" <br />EASEMENT AND 73RTNC A RECOMMENDATION 73ACK TO THE <br />CITY COUNCIL, <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Pedersen. <br />Ayes (5) LaValle, Pedersen, Morelan, Fahey, Scalze. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.